• db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    We can’t. There are effective population controls though.

    Ticks on the other hand could disappear entirely and nothing would be impacted negatively. They’re useless parasites.

  • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    There are only a few species of mosquitoes that pose a threat to humans (and several thousand that don’t). If we had a way to effectively eradicate those few species, then it probably wouldn’t have major consequences. They don’t fill an important, unique niche in their ecosystems like, say, bees.

    But we don’t have a way to do that. Not without huge collateral damage from poisons and the like. There’s been some promising work with genetic engineering, releasing mosquitoes that will mate and produce non-viable offspring. This can greatly reduce a local population in the short-term, but they bounce back.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      This can greatly reduce a local population in the short-term, but they bounce back.

      Not necessarily, all attempts/experiments done so far have been intentionally limited. If we simply throw the dial to 11 and just absolutely flooded the areas it might have a much more long term impact and possibly eradication

  • Zozano@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    At the risk of derailing the conversation, if you haven’t seen The Last Wish, do yourself a favour.

    If you’ve seen the first Puss In Boots and was dissuaded, give this a chance.

    The animation is Spiderverse tier, the theming and context of the movie is very much not for children.

    If you need convincing, take four minutes to watch this clip of Puss meeting >!death!<

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s bizarre to me. We do so much carelessly, but here we’re being extra careful? 600,000 people die of malaria every year. A delay of one day means 1,600 people die.

    • FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      There’s quite a huge domino effect in the food chain if we would cause mass extinction to mosquitoes as they are the food for many species of birds which are then food for the next thing and so on.

      • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m no expert but what I’ve heard is that there are lots of mosquitoes that don’t bite which are more important for the food chain, but the ones that do bite make up a super small part so if we only eliminated the biting species there would still be plenty of other non-malaria-carrying mosquitoes for the food chain.

        At least that’s the theory.

      • Toes♀@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Surely something else could be encouraged to fill in the gap? Would love to see more fireflies.

        • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Well in theory yes. However there are billions upon billions of mosquitos and therefore, despite their small size, they are a large bio-mass.

          If we try and remove a large bio-mass like that from the ecosystem there’s bound to be knock-on effects in the food chain. We need to be sure that gap does get filled and what would fill that gap doesn’t have any effects that could be worse than Malaria i.e. an insect that could swarm and cause famine.

          • Toes♀@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Oh like a plague of locus? Interesting, so the people that are introducing infertile mates into the swarm have they evaluated such risk?

            • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I’m no expert in biology, not my science as I dropped it after highschool, so I’m not going to pretend I know much, I’m merely hypothesising.

              But I do know that removing large parts of bio-mass from the ecosystem will have consequences that need to be considered.

              As far as I’ve read about sterile mosquito introduction is that it’s an attempt at population reduction not extermination. I’m guessing this will allow the experts in this field to study the effect this effort has on mosquito populations, malaria rates, and other insect and mosquito predator populations.

              Also our understanding of biology has come on leaps and bounds and I expect that within the next 50 years (barring a catastrophic event that impacts humanity) we’ll have much more control over the ecosystem and I hope that allows us to improve human life and be better stewards of the environment.

              • BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Iirc part of the reason for sterile releases is to shift the populations. So for example they release them for malaria-carrying sub-populations but leave intact clean populations to fill in the niche.

                There’s also some experimentation with releasing fully fertile specimens that have a specific gut bacteria which makes them unable to carry some of the diseases impacting humans, and is passed down to the young.

    • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The only ones concerned about malaria deaths are also concerned about the ecosystem. The people who are not concerned about the ecosystem are also not concerned about malaria deaths.

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    There are hundreds of mosquito species, and only a couple dozen decided to evolve into little bastards. Let’s give them hell

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    Last year my bathroom would have 2-3 of them buzzing around every night when I went in there. This year I left a bucket of pine sol water in there a few weeks ago after cleaning and no mosquitoes except the shitload of dead ones in that bucket. Do with that information what you will.

    • CptEnder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I had them inside too every winter. Finally realized I should drayno the absolute fuck out of my shower and all gone. I hope they had to watch each other die.

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    All other mammals: Will you guys hurry up and do something already?! We suffer too!!

    • CptEnder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      “Destroy this nature!”

      Humans: you’re about to see what’s called a pro gamer move

      Srsly fuck those little demons

    • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I read a journal about a father and son walking through Canada a long time ago and watching a swarm of mosquitoes take down a bull Moose

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Never used to get bit in the UK but something I can’t quite put my finger on has allowed them to exist now.