What software have you found particularly frustrating or difficult to configure on Linux?

  • ronflex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Probably vim. It works fine out of the box but it took me way too long to figure out things like why my terminal colors were never quite right out of the box (had to set it to 256 color mode or what have you). And once I wanted to use some a few plugins the configuration started getting a bit convoluted/confusing. Hoping I have time some day/remember to figure out how to disable that annoying visual paste mode or whatever it is called that sometimes makes using it over SSH a nightmare.

  • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Jellyseer in docker. It won’t accept my jellyfin login. It just spins and spins. But I plan to use it locally. And everyone says you have to sign in initially not local? I don’t know. I’m annoyed with it and gave up for now.

  • xcjs@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Getting Keycloak and Headscale working together.

    But I did it after three weeks.

    I captured my efforts in a set of interdependent Ansible roles so I never have to do it again.

  • fin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Nextcloud requiring me to set the actual domain when I just want to run it locally was pretty frustrating

  • notthebees@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Trying to disable the lid close sensor on my laptop. My issue is twofold. It’s a convertible (pavilion x360) and I’m using bunsenlabs Linux.

  • WFH@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Installing Fedora. I had almost nothing to configure, it worked out of the box. How frustrating! I had the whole day planned and now what? Enjoy my free time like a pleb !?!

    (/s just in case anyone was wondering)

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Have you any experience with HDR in Fedora? I’m getting ready to build a HTPC and I’m torn between fucking with Arch for everything, but getting bleeding edge support, or trying Fedora for the first time for easier system management. Since it’s an entertainment system, I’m not sure if I want to mess with all the Arch config requirements. But I do want solid HDR support.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Running Fedora with dual HDR monitors just fine, but it’s entirely possible that something is off that I’m not catching. They’re also running off my Nvidia GPU.

        I’ll just add that they look the same as when I used to run Win10 on the same box.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That’s great to hear. I’d miss the AUR, but I think I’ll just try Fedora out for this build. I want to play with the computer, not tinker with the OS.

          • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Oh, just FYI I don’t game, so if there are some HDR features for gaming you’re hoping for, I can’t speak to that.

            • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Yes, I’m going to use it as a couch console, web browser player for MLB games, and a streaming machine. I did a bunch of reading after posting my last comment and decided that I’ll just stick with Arch. Fedora sounds alluring for the simplicity, but I think I’ll miss the AUR and the rolling release cycle too much. I finally pulled the trigger this afternoon and bought the components after looking at them in my cart on Newegg for a week straight. It should be a pretty rad system

              • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 hour ago

                Do whatever works best for you.

                I will say that after years and years of regularly switching workstation and laptop distros for a variety of reasons, after finally giving Fedora a shake, I’m done. I’ve installed it on both my primary laptop and desktops and can’t imagine switching again.

                But I am still sticking with Debian as my primary server base.

                • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  Debian is about as perfect as you can get for a headless server.

                  You have me curious again after hearing you’ve tried everything. Maybe I’ll give it a whirl. It’s not like I can’t switch to Arch later. It’ll be just as much of a pain in the ass later as it will sooner, and I just might find a new favorite OS. LOL. Plus, I do dig Gnome, and I think it’s probably a better DE for a HTPC than KDE.

  • TwistedTurtle@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Setting up a matrix server was a god damn nightmare for me. I eventually got it working but I hit pretty much every conceivable obstacle along the way. Getting the config file just right, the networking, the federation, the coturn server, getting end users to understand they need to backup their keys…

    I’m sure it’d be easier for a Linux pro but I was in way over my head. Only got it working through stubbornness and help from the community.

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s fair, I’ve found wayland to generally be pretty good with Linux now and you can pry hyprland from my cold dead hands

    • digdilem@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Especially during the transition from 2 to 3. Let’s hope that’s all behind us.

    • DasFaultier@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I have limited Python experience, but I always thought that’s what virtualenvs and requirements.txt files are for? When I used those, I found it easy enough to use.

    • JustTesting@lemmy.hogru.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      pyenv and pyenv-virtualenv together solves this for me. Virtualenv with specific python versions that work together well with other tools like pip or poetry.

      It boils down to something like

      $ pyenv install 3.12.7
      $ pyenv virtualenv 3.12.7 myenv
      $ pyenv activate myenv
      

      and at that point you can do regular python stuff like pip installing etc.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        If you’re having to type out version numbers in your commands, something is broken.

        I ended up having to roll my own shell script wrapper to bring some sanity to Python.

        • JustTesting@lemmy.hogru.ch
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          You misunderstand, the first two commands are just one time setup to install a specific python version and then to create an env using that version. After that all you need is `pyenv activate myenv´ to drop you into that env, which will use the correct python version and make sure everything is isolated from other environments you might have.

          You can also just create an env with the system python version, but the question was specifically about managing multiple versions of python side by side and this makes that super easy.

          You could also combine it with direnv to automatically drop you into the correct environment based on the folder you are in, so you don’t have to type anything after the initial setup.

          • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            The issue is more general. When dealing with, say, apt, my experience is that nothing ever breaks and any false move is immediately recoverable. When dealing with Python, even seemingly trivial tasks inevitably turn into a broken mess of cryptic error messages and missing dependencies which requires hours of research to resolve. It’s a general complaint. The architecture seems fragile in some way. Of course, it’s possible it’s just because I am dumb and ignorant.

            • jdnewmil@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              When you come across some Python code for something written 5 years ago and they used four contributed packages that the programmers have changed the API on three times since then, you want to set up a virtual environment that contains those specific versions so you can at least see how it worked at that time. A small part of this headache comes from Python itself mutating, but the bulk of the problem is the imported user-contributed packages that multiply the functionality of Python.

              To be sure, it would be nice if those programmers were all dedicated to updating their code, but with hundreds of thousands of packages that could be imported written by volunteers, you can’t afford to expect all of them them to stop innovating or even to continue maintaining past projects for your benefit.

              If you have the itch to fix something old so it works in the latest versions of everything, you have that option… but it is really hard to do that if you cannot see it working as it was designed to work when it was built.

  • Wojwo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Xserver… Somehow trying to find the magic string of letters and numbers that made your screen work.