• EvilBit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was just wondering about a general privacy goal of having an LLM bot just flood the zone with random data to try and confound advertising models, simulating clicks and likes/engagement across the spectrum just to wreck any meaningful data correlations.

    If you were aiming this concept at two specific targets, i.e., costing the Trump campaign money and screwing with their data, things could get really interesting. Like an open source bot that would coordinate bizarre trends across large cohorts of users to convince the data miners that, for example, a disproportionate number of voters in key regions are demographically or behaviorally skewed.

    • tarmarbar@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      Take a look at this browser extension: https://adnauseam.io/

      As online advertising becomes ever more ubiquitous and unsanctioned, AdNauseam works to complete the cycle by automating ad clicks universally and blindly on behalf of its users. Built atop uBlock Origin, AdNauseam quietly clicks on every blocked ad, registering a visit on ad networks’ databases. As the collected data gathered shows an omnivorous click-stream, user tracking, targeting and surveillance become futile.

      • EvilBit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ooh, that’s nice. Now change “omnivorous” to “targeted” and things get interesting.

        Thanks, friend!

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        AdNauseam quietly clicks on every blocked ad, registering a visit on ad networks’ databases

        Do those clicks appear to be coming from me, or from some random fake identity?

        False floods of data or not, there are some things I’d rather not have any identifiable contact with at all.

          • Zoot@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It should atleast poison any data they gather about you right? Since you’re not ever going to realistically click on any of these ads, it would now look like anything and everything interests you

            • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              it would now look like anything and everything interests you

              That could get you on some interesting lists.

              Personally, I’d rather not have any database think I was interested in certain topics, no matter how false that data is.

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Personally, I’d just limit it to feeding them data that a large undecided segment believes a few provably false outlandish things, so that they publicly endorse said things when they could be spending time doing something socially destructive.

      • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Can we get the politicians to shift from illegal aliens to Sasquatch? Build a wall across Washington state and make Canada pay for it?

      • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean wouldn’t it be crazy, to get something like people are eating cats and dogs publicly said.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I like the idea, but I’d worry about getting sued for fraud. Though it’s not likely that would be a top issue what with his trying to stay out of prison.

      • EvilBit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not a lawyer but I’m not sure how liable you’d be. People run bots all the time. Plus, this is all about numbers. You can’t sue thousands of people like that.