Ever since ditching car culture and joining the urbanist cause (on the internet at least but that has to change), I’ve noticed that some countries always top the list when it comes to good urbanism. The first and most oblivious one tends to be The Netherlands but Germany and Japan also come pretty close. But that’s strange considering that both countries have huge car industries. Germany is (arguably) the birthplace of the car (Benz Patent-Motorwagen) and is home to Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz and BMW. Japan is home to Toyota, Honda, Nissan and among others. How is it that these countries have been able to keep the auto lobby at bay and continue investing in their infrastructure?

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    there were more alternatives such as trains and public trams

    Which is the cause and which is the effect?

    If people have no money for cars, they will demand transit. If the government has no tax money for massive infrastructure projects, but people are still demanding something, they will give buses which are cheap. Then the demand and mentality is to upgrade those to trains.

    • DrunkenPirate@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      As the engine car was invented in 1886, I would say trains and trams were already there. Way before the car entered the scene. Just later at 1908 with Ford T cars became affordable for the non-rich.

      People at that time hadn’t a huge radius of movement. There wasn’t simply not much need.