• Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    For me it’s Motorola because they are one of the few companies still iterating and throwing different weird designs at the wall to see what sticks.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      27 days ago

      Hopefully they’ll throw one at the wall with a slide-out QWERTY keyboard lol. Whoever does that again (that’s not a niche device full of other issues) will get my money immediately.

      • AliasVortex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        27 days ago

        Same. The Motorola Droid 4 is my all time favorite phone, not viable as a modern daily driver, but damn do I miss being able to pop the keyboard out for longer messages, compose mostly coherent messages without looking, or just reclaim screen real estate.

        • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          27 days ago

          Yes, to all of that. Also, I remember using my HTC TouchPro2 as a pocket SSH terminal to log in and check/fix random issues from anywhere. Sad that slide out keyboards on phones were a casualty of the thinness wars.

      • Num10ck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        can they do it with butterfly keys to keep it silly thin? or would they just rattle in your pocket?

    • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      27 days ago

      Agreed.

      $300 for the g84, I’m quite happy. Dual sim Call recording Stereo speakers Headphone socket Oled display Sd card Fast charge 5Ah battery Thin and light. 5g

      Only downside is mediocre camera. Ok if you don’t need to zoom in.

    • Num10ck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      can they do it with butterfly keys to keep it silly thin? or would they just rattle in your pocket?

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      I agree. They seem to never get enough attention in the press but they make really nice phones.

      I will buy an edge 50 pro soon but having a hard time finding the white one for a good price.

  • owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    27 days ago

    Google–not really a fan of the company, but the Pixels have been solid for me. The cameras have always been great, and weirdly, the bootloader has always been easy to unlock (I’m running LineageOS on my Pixel 7), so you can still get some modicum of privacy if you like.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Whichever ones allow bootloader unlocking, make it not a PITA to unlock, and are generally developer friendly (or at least not antagonistic to developers).

    For a while that was Motorola, but I’ve read recently less models are allowed to be unlocked. OnePlus is also pretty good about unlocking the bootloader.

  • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    27 days ago

    I ordered a Fairphone 4 and had it shipped over to the US before they officially supported US carriers and got their reseller state side to fix some minor issues.

    And its also cute I get to play the “Organic” card for a piece a tech. The device itself is good enough and with the repairability focus I can take my battery out as a party trick. (I have seriously done this, it works best for Iphone people)

    • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      How is camera on that? I remember earlier Fairphones were pretty bad in this regard, which was a deal breaker for me.

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        27 days ago

        If the camera is that important, then look for a phone where the camera is the primary feature. Samsung has some nice ones these days, Fairphones offerings are generally average across the industry, many claim they are over priced, but that is due to their picky component/vendor selection (See their attempts at ethicaly sourced parts).

        • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          27 days ago

          It’s not that it’s that important, but what I saw from Fairphone 1 or 2 (I don’t know which model exactly, maybe even 3) was really underwhelming. Not that my current phone makes epic photos, otoh it cost me about third of a Fairphone. Their mission is great and that’s why I’d consider phone from them. I wouldn’t mind slower CPU or less storage for my needs, but not improving camera from my current phone doesn’t make sense for me to switch.

  • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    27 days ago

    Motorola without a doubt. One of the few companies that still believe that a high end phone doesn’t need to cost 2000 dollars.

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    27 days ago

    Samsung. Before I get dunked on let me explain. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is an industrial phone so it lacks a bunch of the standard bloat that comes with consumer grade equipment. It comes with 128GB onboard memory, 6GB RAM, SIM card slot, SD card slot, headphone jack, and even a removable battery! It definitely meets my need to carry around almost a TB of music and videos without needing to resort to streaming services.

    • aesopjah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      27 days ago

      the xcover is a great phone. not the fastest or with the best camera, but the other features make it fantastic. it’s also pseudo-ruggedized, I carry it without a case and it’s held up great to a few typical drops and such

    • HBK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      Hell yes brother! Same. It’s always nice when I’m on the bus or an airplane and I can just break out wired headphones. No worries about charging them, they just work!

    • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      27 days ago

      This feels like the correct answer.

      Motorola and a couple others feel like at least they haven’t jumped on the “let’s charge them whatever the hell we can get away with” train. They’re still relatively inexpensive and are essentially just as capable and nice as the Samsungs and the Apples of the world. Hell, I get far more comments on my Motorola Edge 2023 with it’s textured faux leather back than others get with the latest Sammy or Apple identical square.

      It feels like these smaller producers are able to take a few more risks in design.

  • waz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    If you had asked me a couple weeks ago, I would have said Unihertz. I loved my tiny little Jelly Star.

    Unfortunately, the backlight for the screen died. It is still technically under warranty, but the options they gave me were 1) We’ll ship you the part, and you can pay a local shop to put it in. 2) Pay to mail us the phone, and we’ll fix it and get it back to you in the next month or two. or 3) Buy a replacement phone at a discount.

    It irks me that the only option that won’t cost me more money is having them ship me the part and trying to replace it myself.

    I still like the little phone, but there is no way in hell I am giving that company any more of my money.

    Sorry for the rant. To actually answer the question: I like my Google Phone. I don’t love Google per se, but the phone itself works pretty well.

    Edit: Since writing this, I received the replacement screen, and I will say that it was surprisingly easy to take apart and repair. I don’t think most people already have the tools to do so, and I still don’t think I should be responsible for the repair myself, but I do once again have a functional phone after spending 0 additional dollars. Also, I like the phone just a little bit more because it was substantially easier to take apart than all of the other phone’s I’ve worked on.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    27 days ago

    I’ve always liked LG for phones. But they left the market. Now I’m in pixel which is… Well… It functions.

  • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    27 days ago

    Okay so not specifically to do with smartphones but Nokia was the most innovative and creative designer of cell phones altogether, until they made the unfortunate mistake of going all-in with Windows Phone with the Lumia. They should have been smart enough to see that like almost everything MS does, it was doomed from the start. It was their downfall :-( So sad because they made some of the most gorgeous phones in the world.

    I have a modest collection of Nokia phones and I’d like one day to have one of everything they made.

    Smartphones nowadays are just catalysts to exploitation. There’s no more innovation they’re just cramming more things they can claim as “features” without really making any substantial innovation anymore. There are a handful of gems here and there but they’re really spread evenly across the gamut of brands. Also there are so many more smartphones with cool designs and functionality that are just not available in the U.S.A. I don’t really understand why, other than the big names wanting to keep the market stuck to the same handful of gigantic bricks that refuse the idea of any flavor or character. Maybe they lobby to keep affordable and innovative designs out of the U.S. market so they can keep peddling their mediocrity forever.

  • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    27 days ago

    Ooof, that’s hard. There’s no single favorite.

    Xiaomi and similar (like Poco) I like because of their higher performance and usually including both headphone jack and IR blaster. Currently have X3 Pro.
    What I do not like about them is the tracking. Ads I don’t mind, honestly, but data collection kinda bothers me. You also need a Mi account to unlock the bootloader with a proprietary Xiaomi tool, plus there’s a waiting period. Yuck. I just run the stock ROM on this device. Also, the software feels like unfinished rushed project. I am pretty sure Alpha releases of most custom ROMs are more stable.

    Moving on…

    Google. Yes, you read that right. They not only allow easy bootloader unlocking, but also relocking with a custom key, thus being the choice of Graphene OS.
    What I outright hate is no headphone jack and Micro SD card slot. Otherwise, I’d just get one of the Pixels pretty damn quick.

    Lastly…

    Pine64. Easy to obtain spare parts, pogo pins for hardware expansion (like a keyboard or LoRa module), possibility to communicate directly with the modem over internal serial interface because that’s possible too, built mainly for GNU+Linux distros.
    But the whole idea is very much experimental.

    Could have been Nokia up there if they kept it up with N900.

  • HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Apple actually makes good hardware, believe it or not. The only real shortcomings of the iPhone are the software and the reparability. Say, hypothetically, you could load a custom ROM on an iPhone. It would be my favourite in that case.

    We don’t live in a good world, though, so it has to go to Google. It will continue to be Google until Apple fixes their business. I dislike the buttons being on one side, I dislike the gap between display and the border, and I dislike the cameras being covered when I try to get a grip on the back–but alternative OSes exist. The software is everything. I have far more utility here than on the more expensive iPhone.

    Though, I have to say that I might genuinely consider an Xperia if they had alternative OSes. Good cameras, headphone jack, nice build… it’s a shame I can’t put CalyxOS on one.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    27 days ago

    I used to be a Samsung fan, but they started coming 75% full of bloatware, so I tried the first Pixel when it came out. I’ve bought nothing but Pixels since then.

    • cheers_queers@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      they must have changed a lot since i had one… didn’t have a gallery app, forced me to use the cloud storage, no secure folder, and it smashed to smithereens the first time i dropped it on a sidewalk. it was completely trashed. i am clumsy and drop phones often, and never had that experience before or since