• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I really wonder what would happen if, say, Taylor Swift or MrBeast actually ran for president.

    Who could compete with that? You can say the parties would try to oust them, but look how that worked out for Trump, and he had far less name recognition back then.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      the advtage they have is that they wouldnt be able to be easily be influenced by money, because well, they have a lot already. it would probably be the main reason why neither poltical party would want them to run, because they wouldnt be able to be controlled as easily.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 months ago

        More likely though, they would just pass the reigns after a day or a week or something. Being a President is exhausting, your daily schedule is constantly meeting and travelling nearly all the time. Even the presidents who would go golfing and the like were signing off on stuff and answering urgent phone calls.

      • 474D@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        The problem is that the very wealthy have either gained that through the exploitation of others or born into it. And neither create a healthy mindset as for how the general population should be treated.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      We’re long overdue for a new reform party to run on few or single issue platforms, eg. to end FPTP and institute national ranked choice or star voting. They’d certainly be immune from corporate bribe money trying to drop these policies.

      If they ran as independents to do just that, they’d have my vote. And it’s crazy enough it just might work.