IMO, The US has crumbling infrastructure, corrupt government, dangerous cities, and a lot of homelessness, among so many other problems. Hell, millions of people in the US don’t even have power right now.

What’s the difference?

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          We literally did come up with new terms after the cold war. We now say Developing and Developed nations.

          • Deceptichum@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Nope that was apparently too confusing, now we say global north and global south.

            It’s a much better system, see Australia in the south of the globe, is in the global north for instance. It just makes perfect sense.

      • NotNotMike@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m sorry but that’s still the meaning of the term. I know it is colloquially understood to mean a “poor” country, but we shouldn’t ignore the original intent.

        Also, please don’t tell me how my country is. I quite literally live here. I can read every article online that you can, plus I can go outside and see it for myself. We know we have problems, we aren’t ignorant to them - at least not all of us - and they’re nowhere near as bad as some commentors on this post believe they are.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        As a non american we 100% see america as 3rd world.

        Speak for yourself. I see it as fucked up, but definitely not third-world…