IMO, The US has crumbling infrastructure, corrupt government, dangerous cities, and a lot of homelessness, among so many other problems. Hell, millions of people in the US don’t even have power right now.

What’s the difference?

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 months ago

        We literally did come up with new terms after the cold war. We now say Developing and Developed nations.

        • Deceptichum@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Nope that was apparently too confusing, now we say global north and global south.

          It’s a much better system, see Australia in the south of the globe, is in the global north for instance. It just makes perfect sense.

    • NotNotMike@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m sorry but that’s still the meaning of the term. I know it is colloquially understood to mean a “poor” country, but we shouldn’t ignore the original intent.

      Also, please don’t tell me how my country is. I quite literally live here. I can read every article online that you can, plus I can go outside and see it for myself. We know we have problems, we aren’t ignorant to them - at least not all of us - and they’re nowhere near as bad as some commentors on this post believe they are.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      As a non american we 100% see america as 3rd world.

      Speak for yourself. I see it as fucked up, but definitely not third-world…