• originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    imagine how much farther ahead we would be in safety and efficiency if it was made priority 50 years ago.

    we still have whole swathes of people who think that because its not perfect now, it cant be perfected ever.

    • danielbln@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      So uh, turns out the energy companies are not exactly the most moral and rule abiding entities, and they love to pay off politicians and cut corners. How does one prevent that, as in the case of fission it has rather dire consequences?

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Since you can apply that logic to everything, how can you ever build anything? Because all consequences are dire on a myopic scale, that is, if your partner dies because a single electrician cheaped out with the wiring in your building and got someone to sign off, “It’s not as bad as a nuclear disaster” isn’t exactly going to console them much.

        At some point, you need to accept that making something illegal and trying to prosecute people has to be enough. For most situations. It’s not perfect. Sure. But nothing ever is. And no solution to energy is ever going to be perfect, either.

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          An electrician installing faulty wiring doesn’t render your home uninhabitable for a few thousand years.

          So there’s one difference.

          • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly, just like a windmill running and a nuclear power plant running have very different effects on the power grid. Hence why comparing them directly is often such a nonsense act.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean it’s not the companies operating the facilities we put our trust in, but the outside regulators whose job it is to ensure these facilities are safe and meet a certain standard. As well as the engineers and scientists that design these systems.

        Nuclear power isn’t 100% safe or risk-free, but it’s hella effective and leaps and bounds better than fossil fuels. We can embrace nuclear, renewables and fossil free methods, or just continue burning the world.

        • The_v@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The worst nuclear disaster has led to 1,000sq miles of land being unsafe for human inhabitants.

          Using fossil fuels for power is destroying of the entire planet.

          It’s really not that complicated.

          • abraxas@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Except that nuclear isn’t the only, or even the cheapest, alternative to fossil fuels.

          • umad_cause_ibad@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Both sound terrible.

            I don’t really want to pick the lessor of two evils when it comes to the energy.

          • pedroapero@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Except that powering the world with nuclear would require thousands of reactors and so much more disasters. This doesn’t even factor the space abandonned to store «normal» toxic materials.

            • uis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              This doesn’t even factor the space abandonned to store «normal» toxic materials.

              You mean under ground from where it was dug out?

              • pedroapero@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The plant itself, water inevitably getting in contact with wastes and leaking also.