LaTeX and the wonderful world of \looseness=-1, manual linebreaks and negative vspace
(but it’s still leagues ahead of word)
You can message me via matrix at @zewu:matrix.lemmy.world
LaTeX and the wonderful world of \looseness=-1, manual linebreaks and negative vspace
(but it’s still leagues ahead of word)
Meanwhile Nintendo: almost wait a decade to pay 2x the original price on the used market
Imagine the single USB C port being 40Gbit/s or even 80Gbit/s (USB 4 Version 2). Given a nice docking station and some additional enclosures, you could technically even connect hard drives and run the phone as a low-power NAS. Or/and as a multimedia station for your 4K TV, I mean the integrated GPUs are usually more than capable enough.
A bummer that they stick to USB 2 speeds, even for most high end phones.
The funny thing is that the vast majority of NVIDIA GPUs are probably used in Linux-based systems because of the MLAI hype.
Thank you for the positivity, kind internet stranger.
It is certainly not full any longer
Breaking: turing-complete system can simulate any turing machine
Note that this was an exaggeration of my experience with LaTeX, it’s not like I use these commands everywhere. I think its better to let LaTeX do its job. Nevertheless, looseness=-1 can help to cram a few words in a new line into the previous paragraph, which subjectively looks better sometimes and frees up some space. Negative vspace around figures or tables can also be used to make more space for text and avoid unwanted page breaks. Manual linebreaks can come in handy if you switch TeX engines (e.g. pdfTeX -> LuaTeX) and somehow things don’t look like they are supposed to look. You can do it right or you can add manual linebreaks here and there to get the same results.