• 0 Posts
  • 78 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle







  • But imagine for a moment a world in which a flash dance mob can erupt in the middle of an Ohio mega-mall to confetti, jazz-hands, and live music specifically to convince you, the one standing in the center of a See’s Candies, that clean water is good actually and the city could do a bit better maybe about keeping it that way.

    Yeah, that would be the ideal protest. Chocolate and a show. Some good wine, also, they should do that too.







  • the people making these things will just innovate around whatever the regulations are

    This is why I asked if you think laws are useless.

    And yeah, casinos and whatever will skirt the laws (if they’re able), but the point of regulating a practice is to keep things from getting out of hand.

    Predatory gambling games are basically just fancy theft. You create games that are unwinnable, and then you goad suckers into taking the bet. It’s regulations that keep a lot of them even marginally fair.

    This is a behavioral problem,

    And what of the business’ behavior? Should we not teach them to be better?


  • That’s where I’m coming from. Save the legislation for truly important things

    I don’t disagree, but I feel you’re kind of assuming everyone is capable of rationally engaging with these stupid games. It’s the irrational ones I worry about. Loot boxes and gambling addicts, for instance.

    That said, though, the validity of blaming companies for the bad decisions they make knowing they’ll catch so many fish in their net is all I’m really here for. I’ve no idea how I’d “regulate early access” or if that’s even worth doing.


  • Oh wow, I really riled you up.

    the real problem is the idiots who are paying.

    I mean, I think that this is contentious enough to be worth picking apart.

    I can’t imagine calling someone an idiot unless I thought they kind of deserved what was coming to them. It’s this schadenfreude you seem to feel that I take issue with.

    I’m especially curious about that one.

    Oh, that would be this, actually:

    demonstrates more contempt for one’s fellow man than decreeing that they shouldn’t even be allowed to make their own choices.

    You are, for some reason, arguing against the concept of rules. I never asked you to do that.