One has absolutely no connection with another. It’s been 13 years since BioWare last used Origins’ engine. Few people in software development stay in one company for that long (especially programmers who would feel no personal connection to company’s IP, unlike writers or artists).
Its recommended specs are very low actually, so it’s possible that it will run well without “ultra” graphics features.
If it doesn’t even boot from the USB stick then it’s probably a hardware issue.
Utility is for poors. People who don’t count money want something shiny or whatever their peers have. They can easily replace it if it breaks.
They are trying to make money to stay afloat. Postmarketos is a community project so it’s not comparable. And neither Purism nor Pine64 seem to be huge commercial successes just like Jolla, though they seem to be doing a bit better.
They have been owned by a Russian state-owned telecom corporation for a few years until recent events (Russia currently tries to push Sailfish OS fork as its “russian-made” mobile OS). Original Finnish management has split off to a new independent company with the same name last year, and this looks like their last ditch attempt to continue existing. I don’t expect they will last much longer (the reason why they were bought by Russia in the first place was that Jolla failed as a business).
Qt 6 has been out for more than three years now.
Owntracks link is broken.
Because that’s not an investment, it’s a donation.
It’s not ready yet.
The protocol for apps/games to make use of it is not yet finalized.
Gconf was text though (well XML actually but not binary).
It is scalable but the icons are still drawn against the virtual pixel grid. If an icon is designed to be perfectly pixel-aligned when rasterized at a certain size, then rasterizing it at 1.25 of that size will cause small distortions if it contains small elements (such as 1 px width lines).
Please, someone tell comrade Stalin Xi that this is all just a terrible mistake!
I fear that at these resolutions we will discover that UI frameworks are not really scalable in terms of performance
Even “real” fractional scaling in Plasma with Qt 6 is not much better. Text will look slightly sharper, but icons are still blurry. There is no way for them to look sharp with 1.25 scaling since they are drawn with a pixel grid in mind. Unless you invent some way to stretch svgs so that their individual elements and spaces between them retain their integer-ness while the scale of the whole image is fractional.
The only other solution is monitors with 300+ PPI where blurriness is simply not noticeable (that’s the way Apple went).
It looks mostly the same as XML views but some components look and behave wildly different for no apparent reason (tooltips are one of those).
I have given up on the fight a long time ago. On the desktop the only line I draw is that the app must respect system font configuration and use system-provided file dialogs.
JS by itself is very fast (it’s one of the fastest dynamic languages). It’s interop with platforms APIs that is slow, at the fact that each React app spins up its own instance of Chromium also doesn’t help.
Same with Compose even though it’s ironically considered native in the Android dev community.
The easiest way to tell that the app is not native is tooltips (those that appear when you long press on a button in a toolbar). For some reason UI frameworks just can’t agree to display them in the same way, even if they use material design. Compose’s ones are especially bad (some apps like Play store actually have different kinds of tooltips on different screens, meaning they use multiple UI frameworks in the same app).
They are probably an experienced team members that are needed on ME5, and management decided that they can’t distract them. And these new devs would spend a lot of time figuring out a completely unfamiliar codebase (also creating a proper remaster would also necessitate a lot of low-level changes to the engine which will make it much harder). So it’s a business decision, not technical one.