and seeding seems to work for me.
You can only seed to people who have ports open. At least one side of the connection needs to be reachable.
It’s people like me who keep ports available that are able to seed to you.
Nope. I don’t talk about myself like that.
and seeding seems to work for me.
You can only seed to people who have ports open. At least one side of the connection needs to be reachable.
It’s people like me who keep ports available that are able to seed to you.
When the orders are “come with us, or we kill your family” backed up by, “they did it to the next town over, and 1/4 of the town is now dead or on a train to a camp”. Yes. They were following orders.
Deserting is always an option, and the most ethical one
If you were caught deserting you were killed. And your family often killed as well.
If you were called to conscript and failed to appear. SS would visit your home. You either went with them or was killed… or your family killed. It may be the most “ethical” in your eyes… but these decisions are hard and come with a lot of strife and pain.
Source: First hand account from a conscripted German. Aka my grandfather, who was lucky enough to be conscripted in the very end of the war and DID manage to get a way with desertion only due to that luck. I have family which accounts were documented of the SS killing them for even mentioning that the SS did something inhumane ( a great-uncle of mine).
But editing code running on your computer should be protected as well… I’m personally pretty torn on this one. Ultimately I think that server-side is the only real answer.
Well… No offense… but duh? It’s not like OP can migrate his spouses “Spouse@gmail.com” address to his mail server.
I was under the assumption (and I could be wrong) that OP owns the domain… And wants to run their mailboxes. If she wants to keep her own mailbox and use it, just forward it to her gmail if that’s what she wants. I’m also not insinuating forcing someone into something.
I own my domain(you guessed correctly) and host my own emails. My spouse does use an inbox on my server(actually a few)… If she didn’t want to anymore she can open a mailbox where-ever she wants… and I’ll even forward whatever I get to her. That’s it. Wouldn’t stop me from running my own inbox on my own server. And I’m not forcing her to do anything at all. She can use it or not.
This is the mentality I have when I made the previous comments. Just forward her stuff off, she can go wherever she wants.
Until the basement floods and the server goes offline for a few days
That’s what backups are for.
or botched upgrade that’s failing quietly;
See above
over zealous spam assassin configuration;
That’s an assumption that you’re using this specific product.
What’s funny is you think that all of this can’t happen to your stuff on Google’s servers either for some reason… Say the wrong thing in a Youtube comment? Boom whole google profile banned. All your emails are gone too.
Or random software that interfaces poorly with each other (https://support.google.com/mail/thread/142335843/all-of-my-emails-have-disappeared-how-can-i-recover-them?hl=en)
SMTP is stupidly forgiving. You’re not going to magically lose singular emails.
But one thing is for sure, my wife won’t have any of it. She’s a total backwards thinking give me windows or I’ll jump kind of Gal.
So… forward her inbox to her personal gmail account? Keep your mail server as it was for you?
Can you provide the ruling?
As far as I understand it was simply an “agreement”. Not a legal decision/ruling. Nothing stops M$ from appealing it regardless with this new information. And pointing to MacOS and Android and asking why they’re not being enforced the same way.
And just because a current ruling OR agreement is in place. Doesn’t mean they don’t want to do it. They can easily just make the process harder for those that want Kernel access which could still have the same effect.
Games - Nah that’ll continue on as it has, some get cracked and some don’t, it is what it is.
with Crowdstrike and other considerations… M$ already wants to close kernel access to their systems. This will make most DRM ineffective. I think games in specific will become significantly easier to crack in the near future.
Especially as linux handhelds continue to catch on and do their thing.
So sad that the fold isn’t on this list yet.
Oftentimes that comes out of department budgets. That’s not necessarily 100% tuition funded.
And I showed you a way that we can make it so it doesn’t matter.
Force local hash -> Hash/salt what you get. Password can be a million characters long. You’ll only ever get like 128 characters.
Nothing I talked about said to not validate inputs. Just that we don’t have to limit a persons password selection.
And a meteor can hit my server the exact time you send your hash which will DOS you/others as well. What’s your point.
The thread is talking about what it takes to store passwords. There is not DOS potential in a well designed system. Just because you want to arbitrarily conjure up bullshit doesn’t make that any less true.
Rejecting large inputs != disallowing users to have large passwords. Why are you attempting to straw-man me here?
Sensible upper bounds are a must to provide a reliable service not open to DDOS exploits.
If I choose to make you hash it in browser first… Then I simply don’t care do I? I can hash/salt again when I get your hash. Edit: There are other answers to the “DDOS problem” that don’t require upper bounds.
Good thing there never was any apple because it’s all fantasy improv.
The validity of the story was never in question for me… I’m atheist. Doesn’t mean we can’t discuss the story for what it is. It’s clear the writers of the story called it an apple because that’s what all fruit would have been called. That’s it. Don’t need to shit on someone else’s belief in the process.
Just like the majority of colors were more or less unnamed in a LOT of cultures until relatively recently.
Edit: Typo
Except that basically all fruits were apples for a really long time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple
Etymology
The word apple, whose Old English ancestor is æppel, is descended from the Proto-Germanic noun *aplaz, descended in turn from Proto-Indo-European *h₂ébōl.[3]
As late as the 17th century, the word also functioned as a generic term for all fruit, including nuts. This can be compared to the 14th-century Middle English expression appel of paradis, meaning a banana.[4]
So yes… We have no idea what the fruit actually was. Because all fruit were basically called “apple”.
Nah, since it was banned by name, you just rename.
(No idea what they actually did/will do. Just showing how ineffective the ban would have been)
If you hash in the browser it means you don’t salt your hash. You should absolutely salt your hash, not doing so makes your hashes very little better than plaintext.
That’s not true. If they send hashed password you could salt/hash again on server if you’re trying to keep the salt “secret”. Their hash should always be the same if they’ve submitted the same password. You’d just be hashing a hash in that case… but it’s the same premise.
Works fine in GrapheneOS…