Nah, brad pitt absolutely does not look like he is 35. He may look very good for his age, but not that good.
Your perception of what a 35 year old should look like may have changed as you also aged though.
Nah, brad pitt absolutely does not look like he is 35. He may look very good for his age, but not that good.
Your perception of what a 35 year old should look like may have changed as you also aged though.
You would honestly probably be fine after a short while with lower frame rates. Guaranteed you used to game at those slower frame/refresh rates and never knew better.
I absolutely agree there’s still benefit to be had above 60, but 60 is still mostly fine. Unless I guess all you do is ultra competitive gaming where twitch reactions are necessary.
I dunno… Have you ever opened a crab up before cooking it? It’s pretty much all goo inside an exoskeleton.
So you hate that PCs are more capable and can display better graphics at higher framerates and have rationalized it to yourself that worse graphics and framerates on a console are “how the developers intended”.
I can understand not wanting to tinker with settings and just load a game up and know what to expect in terms of graphics and framerate, but I just cannot disagree more with what you are saying here. Building games to console limitations and not even giving the option for fidelity or framerate just seems like a step backward.
Or actually an error since it’s already back…