• 0 Posts
  • 29 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 24th, 2024

help-circle
  • I don’t have any inherent support either side, and there’s too much history along with bias, propaganda, and outright misinformation to make a determination of who the “good guys” are, if anyone.

    However, in such cases I will support the underdog on the principle that you don’t really want one side to have too much power over the other. That’s how we end up with things like ethnic cleansing and genocide. If Palestine (and Lebanon) had powerful militaries, you wouldn’t be seeing the mass devastation and huge loss of civilian lives. I’d prefer to see the sides more balanced so that they can keep each other in check.

    Another angle to consider is that I consider the state of Israel to be actively harmful to Americans on the basis of:

    • using our tax dollars to commit mass murder against civilians, including a staggering death toll for children

    • infiltrating our government, interfering with our elections, and having an undue level of influence on American policy

    • corollary to the preceding point: they support getting Trump back into the White House

    • training American law enforcement, who then use their oppressive tactics on Americans

    • similarly, technology they develop for surveillance and other means of control being used on Americans

    • directly attacking our First Amendment rights

    Bottom line is I’d say everyone sucks, but in different ways. But I am anti-Israel on the basis of them being way out of control (and without anyone to keep them in check) and due to the threat they pose to the American public.











  • I always wonder how many people who think eating meat is murder, evil, etc. have actually watched animals die in the wild.

    My issue pertains more to forcibly breeding animals into existence for the sole purpose of exploiting them, and also the often terrible conditions they are kept in. I consider hunting and fishing to be more ethical than industrial animal ag, so long as it is done in a responsible manner (yes, I know this is subjective).

    Nature is brutal, but industrial animal ag has absolutely heinous abuses.






  • I’m not sure what percentage of workers could do their job from home if they were allowed to. It’s probably a small minority, though a quick glance of numbers from COVID would suggest 15-20%. I’ll use 15% for sake of argument but would welcome a more “confident” number if someone has it.

    Reducing the number of miles is and important way to reduce impact. Additionally, even those who cannot work from home benefit from reduces congestion and reduces vehicle idling. Although idling has less impact on EVs (though they still have to run HVAC), ICE vehicles are still the majority of vehicles being sold today in most nations and will be in circulation for decades.

    Not everyone can WFH, but it needs to be part of the strategy of reducing emissions from transportation. Not pushing WFH (for those who can) is leaving a lot on the table. This is not a replacement for EVs, rather in addition to.