“Communism never works out”

I fucking wonder why!

Thanks for taking the time to put this together!

Removed by mod

And what about all of those other examples you have conveniently overlooked?

“A curse upon the Jews” must mean something different where you’re from.

Arabs have no problem with Jews. It was in Europe that Pogroms were a regular occurance.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_in_the_Arab_world

Dhimmi were subjected to a number of restrictions, the application and severity of which varied with time and place. Restrictions included residency in segregated quarters, obligation to wear distinctive clothing such as the Yellow badge,[17][Note 1] public subservience to Muslims, prohibitions against proselytizing and against marrying Muslim women, and limited access to the legal system (the testimony of a Jew did not count if contradicted by that of a muslim.

If I break down your door and start beating you to death when you refuse to accept that it is now my house, are you a warmonger for fighting back?

Or if your neighbour who sees me beating you to death throws you a baseball bat, are they a warmonger?

I mean of course you, the person misusing that term, think that.

Democratic socialism is just less openly repugnant capitalism.

Yeah that doesn’t mean what you think it means.

Removed by mod

That’s good it means this experiment should be easy to reproduce.

Sim Racing - Just STFU and play your autistic racing game.

How?

Not the sharpest eh?

Who suggested eating it alone? We already eat a wide variety of food that isn’t animal based, this would continue if we replaced meat with soy.

Way worse for the environment? How so?

What do you suppose they already grow to feed the majority of the meat animals we eat?

We already produce more than enough food to feed the planet, and we’d have 10x more if we ate what we feed industrially farmed animals.

So you do struggle with reading english then yeah? Or is it the concept of self determination that confuses you?

Sure what I said sounds like that, if you ignore the first half of the comment you are replying to.

Cool, so since Britain has held the islands longer than Argentina has existed you consider the matter settled?

The principle of self determination is in the UN charter that you keep erroneously saying suggests the UK should hand over the islands because of.

The other side of the coin of self determination is having the force to ensure that. Britain holds the ground, the people there want this to continue, and Argentina lacks the capability to force this to change.

I am not being deliberately obtuse but its hard when its clear you have no clue what you are talking about. This thread is full of people telling you this but you just keep repeating the same nonsense.

Even if your bullshit wasn’t bullshit, theres another huge difference you are ignoring - the US is capable of doing something about it, Argentina is not.

So the people that have inhabited the island for generations get no say?

You keep comparing this to russia and ukraine, are you feeling alright?