Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlM to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-220 days agotension on kernel mailing lists continues to grow as a Linux Foundation board member finally replies with a "summary of the legal advice the kernel is operating under" re: enforcing US sanctionslore.kernel.orgexternal-linkmessage-square108fedilinkarrow-up1182arrow-down19cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up1173arrow-down1external-linktension on kernel mailing lists continues to grow as a Linux Foundation board member finally replies with a "summary of the legal advice the kernel is operating under" re: enforcing US sanctionslore.kernel.orgArthur Besse@lemmy.mlM to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-220 days agomessage-square108fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-squaremoonlight@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up13·20 days agoDoesn’t Linux already have a bunch of forks? I’m using the CachyOS kernel, for example
minus-squareJustMarkov@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·20 days agoThat’s true, but how much hard-forks do you know?
minus-squareporl@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·19 days agoAt least one for each manufacturer that uses it under the hood in a Tivo-like manner
Doesn’t Linux already have a bunch of forks? I’m using the CachyOS kernel, for example
That’s true, but how much hard-forks do you know?
Relevant, maintained? Zero.
At least one for each manufacturer that uses it under the hood in a Tivo-like manner