Centurion@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · edit-22 months agoIt could have been so easy lemmy.worldimagemessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1361arrow-down129
arrow-up1332arrow-down1imageIt could have been so easy lemmy.worldCenturion@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · edit-22 months agomessage-square41fedilink
minus-squareoberstoffensichtlich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·2 months agoYou can reform the term until it reads x =
minus-squareoberstoffensichtlich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-22 months agoLooks correct. However it’s only valid for n ≠ 0. B
minus-squareaffiliate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoif n = 0 then k = ∞ and just about any value of x works in this case. however x = arcsin(nk -1) still doesn’t work since 0 * ∞ is not defined. so i think the B grade is fair. (this is all assuming we’re working on the riemann sphere)
minus-squareradicalautonomy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-22 months agox = arcsin(nk-1) + z(2*pi), such that z is any integer.
You can reform the term until it reads x =
arcsin(nk-1) ?
Looks correct. However it’s only valid for n ≠ 0.
B
if n = 0 then k = ∞ and just about any value of x works in this case. however x = arcsin(nk -1) still doesn’t work since 0 * ∞ is not defined. so i think the B grade is fair.
(this is all assuming we’re working on the riemann sphere)
deleted by creator
x = arcsin(nk-1) + z(2*pi), such that z is any integer.