• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Neither does yours.

    Of course. That’s why I cited a bunch of actual evidence and examples that aren’t dependent on my personal experience.

    It’s only your personal experience that leads you to believe that it’s all for show.

    Is it? I don’t recall bringing up my personal experience in that matter at all, or bringing up that matter in the first place. Nothing about my personal experience seems relevant to that question, it’s not as if I have firsthand experience with politicians in Washington that I’m using to determine whether they’re trustworthy or not.

    Most people don’t know about legislation that has passed, forget about proposed legislation being a thing that will influence voters. So why would they bother proposing legislation they don’t really want in an effort to bamboozle people who don’t even know about it?

    Now this is just silly. Are you suggesting that performative legislation never happens? It happens all the time, especially during election seasons. Just because not every person hears about ever minutiea doesn’t mean that nobody ever hears about anything or that it can’t influence voters. You’re literally using it right now to try to influence people.

    We can talk about whether this particular example is performative or not, but to rule out the entire concept of performative legislation categorically is ridiculous.