• NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because most people only know Winston for his actions in leading the British to defeat the Nazis, they don’t read his opinions on the Irish or brown people.

  • norimee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Too many bots on both sides.

    Are there still people who expect a genuine conversation between humans on reddit?

  • EABOD25@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    On the topic of Churchill and the Irish Revolt, where are you getting your information from?

  • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Churchill had a negative view of all kinds of people. He is quoted as saying I am in favor of using poisonous gases against uncivilised tribes or I do not admit … for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia..

    As for Bengal famine, when the then Viceroy of India asked Churchill about this, IIRC, he replied that if the famine was so bad, why wasn’t Gandhi dead yet?

    Many defend Churchill as a person of his time but that is contextually untrue. The Vice President of US, Wallace under Roosevelt found Churchill’s views very condemning when the later started boasting about English superiority to him as well.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    White normies hate these bad facts about their dear “nazi slayer” 🤡

    He ordered bangalis straved in case war in Europe turned south, it was a “strategic” decision.

    Sucks to suck being a colony