• EntropyPure@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    2 months ago

    To add on this: removed because it was clear the vote would not have been in favor.

    Was pretty clear that it would return sooner rather than later.

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 months ago

      They will try until it passes. And if it’s stopped in the courts they will try again.

      • EntropyPure@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, same with forcing ISPs to save connection data on all users long term. European court slapped on the hands a couple of times, still not done. Like some kind of undead policy

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        You guys should bring over some judges from the US courts. They will totally protect your freedoms.

        • doodledup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          You need to mark sarcasm with /s.

          If this is not a joke: the US has the worst privacy protection laws on this planet. Laws in China are almost better. And ironically the worst laws for freedom aswell. There is a reason why we have the GDPR laws in the EU that prohibits any user data transfer to US servers.

    • x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      That should be illegal.

      • “hey do you guys wanna go to bar X?”
      • “no we decided to go to bar Y”
      • “good if some of my friends come?”
      • “sure”
      • friends come over
      • “well it looks like most of us want to go to bar X”