I’ve been transitioning to Linux recently and have been forced to use github a lot when I hadn’t much before. Here is my assessment.

Every github project is named something like dbutils, Jason’s cool photo picker, or jibbly, and was forked from an abandoned project called EHT-sh (acronym meaning unknown) originally made by frederick lumberg, forked and owned by boops_snoops and actively maintained by Xxweeb-lord69xX.

There are either 3 lines of documentation and no releases page, or a 15 page long readme with weekly releases for the last 15 years and nothing in between. It is either for linux, windows, or both. If it’s for windows, they will not specify what platforms it runs on. If it’s for Linux, there’s a 50% chance there are no releases and 2 lines of commands showing how to build it (which doesn’t work on your distro), but don’t worry because your distro has it prepackaged 1 version out of date and it magically appears on flatpak only after you’ve installed it by other means. Everything is written in python2. It is illegal to release anything for Mac OS on github.

  • skilltheamps@feddit.org
    7·
    4 months ago

    When you’re maintaining a product that is based on linux, you’re surely qualified to port that thing to your platform yourself.

    Open source developers are thanklessly giving away their work for free already, and for the many things where there’s just a github page it is just a one man show run in spare time. Don’t demand them to give away even more of their time to cater for whatever distro you’re using, just because you are not willing to invest the time to learn how linux works and also not willing to give a way a few megabytes for the dependencies they’re developing against.

    All the discussions about things like distrobox and flatpak where linux novices express their dissatisfaction due to increased disk space are laughable. In the linux universe sole users have no power in deciding what goes, they do not pay anything and at worst pollute the bug tracker. Developers are what make up the linux universe, and what appeals to them is what is going to happen. Flatpak is a much more pleasant experience to develop for than a gazillion distros, hence this is where it is going, end of story. As a user either be happy with wherever the linux rollercoaster goes, or - if you want to see change- step up and contribute.

    • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
      45·
      4 months ago

      Why Linux will never be mainstream ^

      No… It’s the users that are seeing 3 and stupid.

      • Richard@lemmy.worldEnglish
        52·
        4 months ago

        Next time, try to engage rationally and in good faith with the commenter you are responding to :)

        • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
          23·
          4 months ago

          I did. Linux zealots can’t handle the truth about regular users and they mostly do not and will not accommodate them. This conversation has been going on 40 years now.

          • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
            5·
            4 months ago

            Did you forget the part where everybody is getting it for free and devs aren’t getting paid to do this shit? If you want your hand held, use Windows or MacOS.

              • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
                3·
                4 months ago

                So do something about it instead of expecting the rest of us to. Devs are people just like you. They have lives and real jobs.

                What is your solution?

              • ???@lemmy.world
                1·
                4 months ago

                I always felt like most users don’t use Linux not because of any of the things you mentioned, nut because their first computer was a windows or mac.