• ebikefolder@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    What counts as an SUV? Suzuki LJ80? Lada Niva? Parking those costs more than parking a Rolls Royce Phantom or Lincoln Continental?

    • Shadow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The prices will apply to vehicles weighing more than 1.6 tonnes with a combustion engine or hybrid vehicles, and more than 2 tonnes for electric vehicles. The move will not apply to Paris residents’ parking.

      So sounds like it’s weight based, which makes sense I think

        • gian @lemmy.grys.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Right, just until you realize that 1.6 tons for a ICE car is basically a medium size car (my Scenic score 1.4 tons for example) and 2 tons exclude a lot of electric cars (for example 3 out of 4 Tesla)

          • taladar@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            9 months ago

            1.6 tons is quite frankly an insane weight for a vehicle to transport an 80kg human around. That is 20 times the weight of what you want to transport, not to mention the volume overhead and required space on the road including safety distances.

            • gian @lemmy.grys.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              As long as you are alone, I agree. But if you have a family a somewhat bigger car is not that wasted and the 1.6 tons limit cover a lot of cars that can be used by a family.
              If they really wanted to do something for the environment, like they justified the misure, they should have not put a limit on the EV (at least for now) and they should have used the engine capacity or power.

              • taladar@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                If anything people had bigger families in the past but somehow the capacity per car weight has gone down significantly, both for people and cargo.

                • gian @lemmy.grys.it
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  If anything people had bigger families in the past

                  Last time I was in France (4 years ago, before Covid) it was not uncommon to see families with 3 children, so I don’t know… maybe there are not that many in Paris…

                  • user134450@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    The current fertility rate for France in 2024 is 1.847 births per woman, a 0.05% decline from 2023

                    Sounds about right. Western and Central Europe is aging rapidly. I doubt Paris is much of an exception to that rule.

          • maynarkh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            I guess the car industry did not have any pressure to not make heavy as fuck cars until now. If this takes off across the continent, that will push down car weights a bit at least.

          • KISSmyOS@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            The car I had before I went car-free weighed 1.3 tons and was big enough to sleep in with 2 people on a real mattress, or to comfortably carry 5 people with their luggage, or transport a fridge.

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Wouldn’t it make more sense to base it on length and width? I’d assume there’s already various taxes on fuel consumption, but in parking, length and width are what actually matters.

      • gian @lemmy.grys.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Since they say that the SUVs are “bad for the environment” I would have used the engine displacement or power.

          • gian @lemmy.grys.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Wait, if we talk about taking up huge amount of space, using the weight does not make any sense: a Renault Espace or an Audi A6 are bigger than a my Scenic but they weight the same (some models anyway).

        • Vincent@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Mayor Anne Hidalgo argued that SUVs are both dangerous and bad for the environment;

          It’s also size and height of the hood.

      • nodimetotie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Which metric to use is also related to how they are going to enforce it. Surely they won’t weigh cars. It’s more realistic to base it on makes.