• hddsx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s not the question they would ask. Slaves were considered property, not people. Well, until they became 3/5 of a person. And finally, much later on a full person.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      3/5 compromise wasent even about considering them as “mostly” people. It was about how they should be counted as far as a census was concerned, in order to determine the amount of congressional representation for that state.

      They still had no rights and were fully considered property.

      If only Jon brown had been one of the founders.

      • hddsx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Oh absolutely. It was the southern whites wanting more power than they are worth.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think it’s unproductive to treat the founding fathers as a monolith. What Franklin and Hamilton believed was markedly different than the likes of Patrick Henry or Jefferson