cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/18475086

I’m not against those who work for sex, but the idea to earn for a living doesn’t seem nice. IMO, sex should be for 2 people (or more for others who prefer polyamory) who wants to be intimate/romantic with each other. My point is money should not be the purpose.

  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This isn’t in the context of utility value vs exchange value. This is separating value creation from the mode of production.

    • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Be that as it may, your ad hoc definition in your first comment was spurious and finds no basis in English language Marxist literature.

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Can you phrase this as constructive criticism for which are the proper words to use in this seperate use case or do I need to refer you to the constructive criticism handbook?

        Also, establishing working definitions for use in casual conversation is a thing. Please note that I established definitions for their use.