…? Context?
Years ago, a pedophile posted photos online with his face swirled, but police were able to unswirl it:
https://www.minnpost.com/politics-policy/2007/11/you-can-swirl-you-cant-hide/
I have no idea who the guy in this photo is.
It’s Vaush, streamer who accidentally streamed his porn catalog view.
There was a stream where he said he always opened his downloads folder off screen so he didn’t leak his porn folder like a WEEK before the incident and I definitely forgot to snip it because goddamn that’s chekhovs horse right there.
chekhovs horse
That’s Chekhov’s gun i think
I use the construction “Chekhov’s whatever” all the time to signify “something has been introduced so it will come up again later.” It’s a meme now. It has outgrown the gun.
Chekhov’s Chekhov.
Fair enough.
Guy in the picture is an online politics streamer and has a running “joke” that he’s a pedophile.
AFAIK he’s not and there’s no real evidence supporting it. He is, however, a horse botherer.
Back when the war in Ukraine started someone faked a news story about the “Karkiv Kid Finder”, which got some attention. https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/cnn-did-not-tweet-a-story-about-the-kharkiv-kid-finder-idUSL2N2VB0UM/
He was caught with loli porn during a stream by accident. It didn’t help his optics.
My understanding is that in a porn folder one of fictional well endowed characters was apparently supposed to be under aged. I also understand there were numerous horses.
🐎🐴🎠
Dude swirled his face to obscure his identity from the cops. Dude is a kiddie toucher.
Police simply reversed the swirl and got the original image.
That was the original guy, I have no clue if this guy is related.
He is not
After that story was published, nobody uses the swirl effect to hide their identity anymore. This is edit: satirically another pedophile, which was outed by accidentally opening his homework folder on a livestream.
No, this is a joke post, Vaush is not a pedophile.
It’s a semi-joke post, Vaush was exposed for having a loli porn folder.
Nor should they. Lossless image manipulation doesn’t remove data. Fortunately, a dumb pedophile was caught due to his lack of security awareness.
swirling is not lossless, but it doesnt remove enough identification
deleted by creator
That guy in the picture is a streamer I think, he seems somewhat controversial but as far as google says not a pedo. Interpol really did unscramble a pedo face
Something something another leftist is a pedophile something something
Always those fucking left wing radicals …
If god approves, it’s not pedophilia apparently
Killed by no /s. Sad way to go
I could not care any less for Vausch but since some beg to add political connotation to this because he is leftish, please take your time to visit some old anti-nazi subreddits. You will find some very long lists of right wingers convicted of assaults against women and children, so there is that.
There’s a while subreddit for r/RepublicanPedophiles.
deleted by creator
RIP Vaush (1889 - 2024) he was cancelled by the woke mob 😔
May he rest in peace and I hope Jesus gives him all the horse cock he could wish for in heaven 🥺🙏
The last sentence makes me think this is satire and that thought gives me hope
There’s no edited tag on the post so I have to wonder how (1889-2024) wasn’t an indicator too lol
What on earth makes you even consider the possibility this could be anything but satire?
tbh the number of downvotes from people who missed it
Not satire lol
Morpheus.jpg
What if I told you cancelling doesnt exist.
