• Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s because it isn’t. You may get a few more FPS out of it than the Steam Deck in some games but overall it’s a much worse experience.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        User experience is more than raw performance numbers. In my personal opinion, the Steam Deck is still easier and more enjoyable to use.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          In what games do you get 120 FPS?

          I stay under 60 fps the vast majority of the time and while the games i play are fairly demanding I personally think going over 60 or even 40 is a waste. I would rather increase the quality and/or reduce the power consumption.

            • lud@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I should probably get Hades 2 someday, I should just finish Hades 1 first and probably wait for release.

              What FPS and battery life are you getting on Hades 2?

              I really want an OLED deck but I can’t really justify the additional cost. The bigger battery and slightly improved efficiency seems like the best part about the OLED edition.

              Anyways I usually only play on the train and most often on the bus to work, so as long as I charge the Deck each day it usually holds up well both ways.

    • lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s worth it. I’ve bought two of them. Use almost daily. For me it’s the coolest piece of tech I own, and I do have a very powerful gaming PC…