• Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Gotta love to use a currency with that fluctuating value. /s

    When I pay for a coffee and the shop says that I paid the equivalent of 5 cents. Then, I pay the rest and all of a sudden: I paid the equivalent of 100€.

      • makeasnek@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Bitcoin uses <1% of global electrical usage, mostly from renewables since miners must chase the cheapest electricity and renewables at off-peak times are it. They turn off during times of peak demand since they can’t afford higher-priced electricity. How do you think that compares to banks? Remittance services? All the infrastructure used to move money from point A to point B? It takes energy and even more valuable: human capital to move value around.

        For reasons why Bitcoin isn’t a huge waste of energy and why it actually helps stabilize grids, increase efficiency, decrease electrical costs, and subsidizes the provision of new renewable infrastructure, see https://endthefud.org/

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Considering how much of a nieche Bitcoin still is: 0.5% of global energy usage is one hell of a lot of energy!

          In what universe is proof-of-work more efficient than conventional banking systems?

          • Dymonika@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Let’s talk about banks.

            Let’s talk about all the vaults and their maintenance, the security guards, the Brinks armored cars, all the tellers, wire transaction-handling, and so on and so on.

            No, gee, hmm, they’ve never calculated how much a vast, global expense all of this is per second.

            Maybe they want you to keep believing that it’s more efficient.

    • makeasnek@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Gotta love to use a currency with that fluctuating value. /s

      When I pay for a coffee and the shop says that I paid the equivalent of 5 cents. Then, I pay the rest and all of a sudden: I paid the equivalent of 100€.

      How has your USD or EUR held up the last 5 years? Buys fewer eggs than it used to huh? Bitcoin has held up pretty damned well. Its price has gotten more stable with time, it is more stable than most national currencies already. Stability is a reflection of scale. Need perfect stability? You can use Bitcoin for payments while receiving and sending in USD or your currency of choice, just use Bitcoin as the settlement layer. Strike already does this in like 20+ countries with instant settlement times thanks to lightning. And no fees.

      Fiat currency is guaranteed to lose value over time. Central banks set a target inflation rate of 2-3% per year. Bitcoin may gain or lose value over time. Choosing between a guaranteed loss of value or a potential loss/gain in value, the choice is clear for me. For 15 years in a row, holding BTC has been a better investment than holding USD.

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Buys fewer eggs than it used to huh?

        Yeah. But it has been way more stable in the timespan of a few minutes.

        Please read up a bit on economics. You’re embarrassing yourself with your austrian brainworm.