• firecat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    The article also is too favorable for Valve and doesn’t mention alternative methods. The billion dollar company should allow people to install games on their browsers. The client is nothing but an analytics and tracker. There’s no benefit, just like there’s no benefit in XBox or PS4/5 achievements or their features.

    • Tingly3771@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      You’re kidding right? The Steam client is overflowing with features, beyond the nice and simple mod manager, multiplayey systems for easy joining it also has a full featured discord alternative inside the chat system with voice and text chat and I think even screen sharing. To compare it to Xbox achievements is just insane for how much the steam client provides.

      • firecat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        XBox does the sane thing, why do you think it costs money to play multiplayer. Steam multiplayer isn’t even used because corporations have their own servers. The Client really is useless as it’s just a copy of XBox/PS+

        • YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          why do you think it costs money to play multiplayer

          Bad decisions from MS with the original xbl that were copied by the entire industry mostly.

    • macniel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The billion dollar company should allow people to install games on their browsers

      How should that work?