• MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    They’re not making a technical argument but a practical one.

    Who ever owns the chain is the ACTUAL owner of the NFTs. Who ever owns the physical hardware is the ACTUAL controller of the chain.

    The probpem with NFTs is … they only solve theoretical problems, not problems in the real world, where it ALWAYS takes agreement and cooperation for anything to ACTUALLY function and serve a purpose.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not to mention, at scale, big things like cars and houses are sold a ton every single day…

      Having to use all that electricity to mint an NFT every single time, not to mention cases mentioned above like “Oops got it wrong”, yikes…

      Would that cost more electricity than hypothetically shifting all vehicles to electric? Now I’m curious haha.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I mean, you can use other systems besides cryptographic proof-of-work to determine legitimacy of stakeholders of a blockchain. It doesn’t necessarily have to waste power.

        That being said, none of the other alternatives are really viable either. Proof-of-stake? So the “richest” people on the chain control all the money? Sounds like we just reinvented the late-stage-capitalism we already have.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Nah, movement is a ton of energy be it gas or electric. Electric vehicles are still the future for the simple fact that they replace something even less economical or long term.

        NFTs replace nothing. Not with an improved version, anyways.