If inciting an insurrection towards their own government is an action without legal repercussions, I don’t see how the law would be less lenient about straight up firing a gun at an opponent.

I by no means want any party to resolve to violent tactics. So even though I play with the thought, I really don’t want anything like it to happen. I am just curious if it’s actually the case that a sitting president has now effectively a licence to kill.

What am I missing?

  • Veneroso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    You just need to pull the “it was in the best interest of the United States” card and it’s an official act.

    • xenoclast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well then why hasn’t he done it… I can’t think of something of a more positive interest than to dump trump down a hole.

      • problematicPanther@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        because biden (and the democratic party in general) are a bunch of cowards who think that they will prevail simply by taking the high road. Fascism was never defeated by strongly worded speeches or political actions, it always took blood.

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s not currently in the best interest.

      IF Trump wins the election then it would be in the best interests of the US. It would be akin to a judge throwing out a juries verdict because the jury clearly made the wrong decision.