• The Masjid Akhonji in New Delhi, which its caretakers say is around 600 years old
    • A heavy police presence had barricaded roads outside the grounds on Thursday and refused access to the site

Bulldozers have knocked down a centuries-old mosque in India’s capital, a member of the building’s managing committee said on Thursday, during a demolition drive to remove “illegal” structures from a forest reserve.

The demolition comes at a sensitive time in India with nationalist activists emboldened in their long campaign for the replacement of several prominent mosques with Hindu temples.

The Masjid Akhonji in New Delhi, which its caretakers say is around 600 years old, was home to 22 students enrolled in an Islamic boarding school.

It was torn down on Tuesday in a forest of Mehrauli, an affluent neighbourhood dotted with centuries-old ruins from settlements predating modern Delhi.

Mohammad Zaffar, a member of the mosque’s managing committee, told AFP that it had not received any prior notice before a demolition carried out “in the dark of the night.”

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Is it just me or does that building look nowhere near even 60 years old, never mind 600?

    E: people are interpreting this as me condoning destruction of historic buildings. It is not. I’m merely saying that I’m shocked the building is old, given the appearance.

    • nicetriangle@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Being that the exterior is some sort of stucco/earthen kind of material, it would have been refinished on the outside multiple times in 600 years. There’s buildings around 800 years old where I live that are in great condition because they’ve been well maintained. Also it’s pretty typical for old religious buildings to have been added onto and modified in phases. Quite a lot of the big old churches in Europe changed in design and grew in size over 100s of years, for example.

    • BarbecueCowboy@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s a hard thing to talk about without coming across as inflammatory, especially considering the purpose of the building. I couldn’t find many other pictures of it beyond that one, but it didn’t seem like it had a lot going for it beyond the fact that a building serving that purpose had been at that site for 600 years.