Whenever AI is mentioned lots of people in the Linux space immediately react negatively. Creators like TheLinuxExperiment on YouTube always feel the need to add a disclaimer that “some people think AI is problematic” or something along those lines if an AI topic is discussed. I get that AI has many problems but at the same time the potential it has is immense, especially as an assistant on personal computers (just look at what “Apple Intelligence” seems to be capable of.) Gnome and other desktops need to start working on integrating FOSS AI models so that we don’t become obsolete. Using an AI-less desktop may be akin to hand copying books after the printing press revolution. If you think of specific problems it is better to point them out and try think of solutions, not reject the technology as a whole.

TLDR: A lot of ludite sentiments around AI in Linux community.

  • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Honestly what we have now is AI. As in it is not intelligent just trys to mimic it.

    Digital Intelegence if we ever achive it would be a more accurate name.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Look, the naming ship has sailed and sunk somewhere in the middle of the ocean. I think it’s time to accept that “AI” just means “generative model” and what we would have called “AI” is now more narrowly “AGI”.

      People call videogame enemies “AI”, too, and it’s not the end of the world, it’s just imprecise.

    • FatCat@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      This is a bit philosophical but who is to say that mimicking intelligence with advanced math is not intelligence. LLMs can perform various thinking tasks better than humans we consider intelligent.