• z00s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    This might take several minutes

    …or itcould take several hours

    • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      It says “several” but I think it means “many”, important distinction to make there Microsoft.

    • EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      49
      ·
      5 months ago

      or itcould take several hours

      only if you have a shitty computer full of garbage. My windows updates only take 2 minutes or less. even feature updates only take about 4 minutes to reboot.

      Windows is only shitty if you don’t know how to use it. Just because you know what the buttons do doesn’t mean you know how to use it.

          • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            You have to cut Microsoft some slack on mandatory updates. They’re still traumatized from the XP era when they were the platform of choice for botnets and “Windows security” was a laughing stock.

            • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              5 months ago

              Tbh, if Linux had the same user base as windows had back then a large amount of people would postpone any update indefinitely and we’d be in the same shit.

              • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yeah it’s a different game when your user base is tech savvy and self-selecting. When you have to deal with a billion non-technical people you have to be a lot more protective.

                But even so Linux seems miles ahead. It’s Microsoft who should be the most motivated to add things like AppArmor, Flatpak, immutable system, curated app repos, executable as a filesystem attribute etc. They’re doing none of that, they plateaued at UAC and bundling their own antivirus.

                • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  They tried. UWP and the Windows Store did loads to boost security and make the source of apps verifiable, but people hated it and barely used it, so the holes they were supposed to patch stayed open. The store itself did have the problem that part of its raison d’être was to try and take a cut of the sales of all software for Windows, like Apple do for iOS, and UWP made certain things a pain or impossible (sometimes because they were inherently insecure), but UWP wasn’t tied to the store and did improve even though it’s barely used.

                • dan@upvote.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  executable as a filesystem attribute

                  This already exists. It’s labeled as “Traverse folder / execute file” in the UI.

                  NTFS permissions are also more powerful than the default Linux permission system. Instead of just being able to define permissions for a single user and single group, you can define them for an arbitrary number of users and groups.

                  I say “default Linux permission system” because you can actually use ACLs on Linux (getfacl and setfacl commands), they’re just not used by default. They used to be common in businesses and schools, but these days everyone seems to store their files “in the cloud” and the permissions are managed there instead.

                  curated app repos

                  This is what the Windows store is supposed to be. There’s also WinGet, but I’m not sure if it’s curated.

                  • the_doktor@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    NTFS permissions are just needlessly complicated and convoluted and create more problems than they solve for desktop use. They’re more for server use, but then again, so are ACLs on Linux. If Windows would just use simple permissions like Linux does, it’d be a hell of a lot better.

                    The Windows store is also a sandboxed, heavily restricted pile of trash you can’t even get at for most of its apps. And Winget has so many issues from its install scripts not working right to just being outright broken that it’s not worth using. Even flatpak installs can be easily modified and used normally.

                    The excuses for using obsolete Windows continues by its paid shills and brainwashed users. Give it up.

          • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Absolutely, but unless you’re on a rolling release, it still won’t be that long. For example, my homelab ubuntu server didn’t get updated for over a month, but when I finally did run updates it finished after no more than a minute. Depends a bit on hardware and network speed though.

            • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              It shouldn’t be an issue even on a rolling release. I mean it’s not like it installs every intermediary version of every package, it just jumps to the latest versions no? At least that’s how I imagine it works.

                • Mio@feddit.nu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Yes. The question comes down to how many of these you need. And do you have the resources for it?

                  • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    My Computers are all reasonably modern and decetly spec’d, resources should not be an issue. Ubuntu also ships with a lot more pre-installed packages than tumbleweed does, but I get your point.

      • the_doktor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Bullshit, paid Windows shill. Even a brand new, high end PC on a fast internet with a fresh (non-OEM full of crap) install of Windows takes LITERALLY SEVERAL HOURS to fully update and often even minor updates will take at least an hour depending on what’s being updated.

        Don’t give me that shit. You know it’s a lie. Windows is trash.

      • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        or it could take several hours

        Would give you enough time to get your mouse drivers working on Linux then