Those seem incompatible to me.

(UBI means Universal Basic Income, giving everyone a basic income, for free)

  • PostProcess@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Studies in motivational theory have been around for years which generally agree that at a very basic level people need security first, not necessarily to motivate but to be in a position to be motivated. Repeatedly pay has been proven to be a poor motivator over time. By removing the basic insecurity that people face, you give them a chance to focus on actual motivating factors like job satisfaction, self-worth and realisation.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Absolutely. Security is the enemy of fear and capitalism. Fear as Frank Herbert put it, is the mind killer. If we have security, all of a sudden the horrendous business practices capitalism has been built on and motivated by. Sort of fall apart. Go to work in a soul crushing job, with a toxic environment, for too little pay? Why, when you could stay home and start your own business, maybe even become a better competitor. Or just wait for something better to come along.

      Fear is the tool of the powerful. Whether it’s fear of some group they tell you to fear. Or fearing them directly. Without fear, many of the crises we seem to constantly be juggling. Would find themselves solved. Humanity has the ability to feed and house everyone. Right now. The reason we don’t is that the wealthy and powerful would lose wealth and power. And we can’t have that.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        If security is the enemy of capitalism, how do you explain people who have their needs met, who still strive under capitalism?

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          People who have their needs met would strive regardless of capitalism. You need to show that they strive because of capitalism. The problem is, capitalism doesn’t meet the needs of a large amount of people. No matter how hard they strive. Nor should it be necessary for them to. Worse capitalism short changes them. And is very inefficient.