I’ve been trying to find a good Marxist instance, but Lemmygrad and Hexbear are widely hated. Why is that? Are there any good leftist instances?

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Lemmygrad and Hexbear aren’t “leftist” in the confused sense that Americans usually mean “leftist.” They’re actually leftist in the original sense, meaning that they want to abolish private ownership of the means of production. To the extent they’re “widely hated,” it’s largely because the Anglosphere has been indoctrinated against real, actual socialism their entire lives.

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      More often than not, when Americans say leftist they really mean left-liberalism a la Bernie Sanders, which is really center-left at most, and not actually leftist in the original sense, a sense which Americans have forgotten thanks to two Red Scares and the first Cold War.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        True, but leninists are not leftist in any significant sense either. They are more authoritarian/ totalitarian than they are left or right.

        • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Totalitarian is an invented term, and every single government and governance structure is “authoritarian” by definition. These words mean hubris, and are dogwhistles for anti-communists.

          If Leninists are not leftists according to you, you might as well start to claim Hitler was not a fascist, and Bush, Obama, Clinton, Churchill were all great homies.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      That’s not the part people have an issue with, the part where their users deny genocides, call everyone that has a less extreme left opinion of politics Nazis, end up being so “anti-racism” that they’re racists themselves and take all critics as personal attacks, that’s what people have an issue with.

      • SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Wild how much footage is coming out of Gaza right now showing an actual ongoing genocide, yet Zionists and their water-carriers will harp on and on about how Israel is merely defending itself.

        Nothing of the sort from Xinjiang. At all.

        I’d like to see ONE verifiable image or video depicting this supposed Uyghur genocide we’re denying. ONE. Apparently it’s one of the worst human atrocities occuring right now. One of the worst in HISTORY.

        So… show me a single picture. Fetish porn doesn’t count. Where are the dead bodies? Where are these supposed mass graves?

        Love to break it to ya, they don’t fucking exist and they never did. You’ve been lied to.

        • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The US state department lawyers and the British House of Lords have evidence. That’s why they’re pursuing convictions of the Chinese leaders involved. No, wait— sorry, I misremembered. They both concluded there is insufficient evidence.

        • socsa@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          So you agree that there is a strong argument for Russia seeking genocide in Ukraine as well, right?

          • Camarada Forte@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Israel has killed more civilians (mostly children and women) in a month of war than Russia has killed in almost two years. The Russians actually target almost exclusively military infrastructure, they have preserved electrical grids, water stations, communications infrastructure, etc… Not because they are “good guys”, obviously, but it’s a part of their strategy. But it shows genocide is not a part of this strategy.

              • Camarada Forte@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                The article was written by Timofei Sergeitsev, a Russian “philosopher” with no direct link to the government. The article in the website you linked was written in early April 2022, very early after the war, when no one knew what to expect. It was claimed it was “proof” the Russians was intending to genocide Ukrainians.

                More than a year later, have we seen anything like it? Have we seen active actions from the Russians to consistently destroy civilian buildings and systematically cause civilian casualties on purpose? I at least haven’t, unless we are talking about a completely different war which I’m not aware. I don’t excuse the Russians of anything, I’m sticking with the facts. The Russians have been very careful not to cause non-military casualties, which is extremely odd for a genocidal regime.

                So, in short, it’s your article written by a guy with no links to the government vs. what the actual war itself shows in practice. I prefer to see what practice shows us.

                • socsa@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Feels like ad hominem. The point is that you are unwilling to even engage with the idea that Russia seeks to eliminate Ukrainian identity, an idea which is reported by a number of primary Russian sources in a variety of media. Putin himself expresses frequent open skepticism of Ukrainian nationality. Not to even mention the internationally recognized mass deportation of children.

                  I won’t argue that Israel isn’t an apartheid state engaging in collective punishment. Meanwhile you will turn yourself in circles to defend Russian aggression, and for the life of me I can figure out what that has to do with liberating workers. It just feels less like intellectual honesty and more like campism. But then somehow I’m the brainwashed goon for actually attempting to maintain something resembling ideological consistency.

      • Camarada Forte@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        their users deny genocides

        If you are referring to the Xinjiang issue, then it just reaffirms what @davel@lemmy.ml just said:

        it’s largely because the Anglosphere has been indoctrinated against real, actual socialism their entire lives

        Because the “Uyghur genocide” in Xinjiang is another example of propaganda. Or do you really think the West cares about Muslims and want to protect their “freedom”?

        call everyone that has a less extreme left opinion of politics Nazis

        I don’t see anyone in Lemmygrad calling other people “Nazis” because they disagree with someone in a discussion. I usually see them criticizing others as “liberals.” This is either a misrepresentation of leftists in general, very common among conservatives, or you are frequently being called a Nazi. I don’t know, maybe that’s on you? 🤔

        end up being so “anti-racism” that they’re racists themselves and take all critics as personal attacks

        That’s so specific you should give at least one example of this. We have very strict moderation against any bigotry, so I challenge you to link any “racist” attitude or comment you have seen in Lemmygrad. I will give you 24 hours, and if you don’t reply with an example, I will edit this comment saying you chickened out.

        EDIT: They chickened out, as expected.

      • davel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        The “Uyghur genocide” is bullshit Atlanticist propaganda, and English-language Wikipedia is basically NATOpedia in its slant on the topic, so yes we will deny it. It’s a product of the new Cold War propaganda campaign against China.

        • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Atlanticist crackers are exactly why I’m a third-worldist; I genuinely care more about my community’s diaspora than I’d ever care about these genocidal neocolonist crackers

        • redballooon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Here are some properties of any conspiracy theory worth it’s name:

          • Closed Ideological Systems: They provide an all-encompassing explanation for various events or states, with everything fitting into their worldview.
          • Immunity to Facts: Any contrary evidence is dismissed as false or considered part of the conspiracy.
          • Enemy Construction: They tend to draw a clear line between “us” (those who “know the truth”) and “them” (the supposed conspirators).
          • Adaptability: Conspiracy narratives can change and incorporate new “evidence” or events to maintain their credibility.

          It matches for QAnon and the MAGA crowd as well as the lemmygrad crowd.

          • Camarada Forte@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            How ironic! Let’s see if it fits for the “genocide” position:

            • Closed Ideological Systems: Whether those who defend the idea of “genocide” in Xinjiang are aware or not, the sources used to claim there is a genocide in Xinjiang is usually Adrian Zenz, a German white supremacist and Christian fundamentalist who claimed in his book Worthy to Escape that “other belief systems are ultimately inspired by Satan” and justifies “eternal punishment” for those who refuse to believe in Jesus.

            • Immunity to Facts: Every time one tries to argue that Xinjiang faced a policy of de-radicalization of terrorists who led many attacks against the province, those who claim there is a genocide there say they are “genocide deniers.” I’ve even seen people saying those who don’t agree with the “genocide” position are paid by the Chinese.

            • Enemy Construction: I can’t even count the number of times people have called those who don’t promote the “genocide” propaganda “tankies” and dismissing them instead of engaging with arguments.

            • Adaptability: The “genocide” propaganda claims there is a genocide there, and then when presented with the fact that even those who were put in the re-education facilities were allowed to express their culture with dances and art on video, the “genocide” conspiracy theorists say that it was a fake, an act, that it was a spectacle organized by the Chinese to hide the genocide. Just to give you an example.

            It does match the “genocide” position very well. I’ve yet to see a genocide which preserves the language, the culture, the customs and the places of worship of a people. Another thing, notice the reaction of Muslim countries to the actual genocide being perpetrated by Israel. They are firmly condemning it through all channels. In contrast, the policies of de-radicalization by the Chinese were unanimously well-received by Muslim countries.

            • SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Another thing, notice the reaction of Muslim countries to the actual genocide being perpetrated by Israel. They are firmly condemning it through all channels. In contrast, the policies of de-radicalization by the Chinese were unanimously well-received by Muslim countries.

              Very generous of you to assume that many of these folk believe Muslims and Arabs are human beings capable of forming their own opinions and international policy. The opinions of actual Muslims are similarly handwaved akin to any communist’s opinion.

              These states’ international defense of China’s de-radicalization program is stated to merely be because they are money-hungry opportunists, buddying up with China while ignoring a politically and economically inconvenient genocide. 🙄 How… adaptable this narrative is.

              The seemingly unending wave of videos of Uyghurs in China recording themselves in their homes and making it clear they are not undergoing genocide have to be ignored. In fact, they have to be deleted by the platforms hosting them. How utterly immune to facts this narrative is.

              If these countries care about Palestine, oh… I don’t know. Russia is making them care. Iran, maybe? Maybe North Korea or China are forcing these Muslims to hate Israel. Who else are we being directed to hate right now? Afghanistan? Just throw a dart at the “Axis of Evil” board and pick an “uncivilized” nation. It’s their fault. Why not?

          • ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            not having the self awareness to realize this applies to anti-communists, not communists/MLs as they use scientific reasoning.

            • redballooon@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              Just to understand what you are saying, do you say communists apply scientific reasoning?

                • redballooon@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  That’s very abstract and doesn’t mean much. With as many words you can say capitalism is based on scientific reasoning.

  • Che Banana@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I could tell you, but the last time I responded to a thread like this I got banned for a couple weeks because toxic political personalities aren’t very tolerant.

  • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Neoliberal McCarthyism good fascism okay communism bad

    blue eyes blonde hair good democracy people everyone else bad ebil totalitarian

  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I wouldn’t be a fan of a nazi or islamist instance either. One for communists is hardly any different as far I’m concerned. They’re all groups of extremists that I don’t want anything to do with. Just look at the modlog of this instance for example. Exhibit B is the fact that this message will get deleted in couple hours and I’ll likely be banned.

    • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Liberals don’t even really hate fascists, they just pretend to condemn them to keep up international appearances; as the past year’s slippage, then shameless tearing-off of the mask has shown us. No one should be surprised by this, either-- the American way has always been clad in a pointy white robe, clutching a rifle in white-knuckled hands; if you peel back all the mythologizing.

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Well it’s because they are Marxist.
    In the Lemmy culture Marxism has a very bad name because almost religious overtones of its adherents.

    Which is of ironically very much what Marx was warning against. But that’s how it works right now.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Leninism is antithetical to Marxism. As you said. If they were Marxist there wouldn’t be a big issue. They’re Leninist as an angry 13 year old can be. Combined with the fact that people in the West, the US especially, have no idea what either one is. And that’s the problem.

  • LemmeAtEm@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Lemmygrad isn’t “hated” by most of the wider lemmyverse. There’s just a loud and obnoxious minority of people that will rail and rant about lemmygrad. They loudly rant about lemmygrad because they aren’t used to seeing their worldview get challenged and by its very nature as a radical leftist community, lemmygrad is a challenge to the typical background liberal perspective.

    It’s no surprise we all end up seeing a lot of threads about “those mean tankies at lemmygrad” (and hexbear too) made by people who can’t take their worldview getting questioned, or even shown to be flawed, or just not standing up to their own scrutiny, and who get mad when that happens. There are also of course people with ideological reasons to demonize leftwing politics and will spread shit for that reason alone. But overall, I don’t think most people care enough except to think “oh yeah that’s that instance with those radical lefties, they’re weird but they do make some great memes sometimes.”

    • Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      There are people who called the main lemmy.ml instance a community of tankies, so I’d take a lot of these claims with a grain of salt.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      There’s a difference between challenging other people’s opinions and calling them fascists or Nazis just because they’re not at the extreme left.

      Even worse, in this very thread I’ve been called a fascist for the sole reason that my instance is sh.itjust.works, one of the bigger instances and one where your political opinion isn’t a criteria to subscribe (especially not when I subscribed, they didn’t even ask for an email!)

    • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m pretty left/lean socialist. The tankies that annoy me from those instances are pro authoritarian communists who say shit like “Stalin did nothing wrong” with no irony whatsoever. It’s not really about bickering over ideological purity past a certain point, some of that shit makes a good case for the horseshoe theory

      • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        “I’m as left as they come but I’m still going to throat the entire State Department patent leather shoe talm bout ‘authoritarians’ like that’s anything more than another white-folk-slur for brown leaders who deny them” you are a fucking joke