I just think the novelty of these type of displays was up in the 90s, It’s time for an upgrayedd. I propose leprechauns flying up and down the river wearing water jet packs, shooting people with their Chicago-style hot dog cannons would be more with the times. What’s your idea?

  • Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t care so much about the novelty. I want to know what impacts this has on the environment.

    I assume it’s been studied to be non-toxic for fish. Or at least I hope it has. But what about other effects it might have? Does it significantly reduce visibility and impact the ecosystem in that way? Some other effects?

    • FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Pretty sure you can eat Fluorescein with no ill effects other than turning your piss dayglo. It’s very widely used as a ‘non-toxic’ tracer dye so I’d imagine studies have been done.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Have they done studies on this scale? Probably. But still a valid question. If nothing else it kind of desensitizes us to pouring green sludge into rivers. Fuck do I know, I’d be freaked out if I was a fish. I’d also eat a incandescent neon green fish, but that’s on the fish.

          • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Doing something isn’t the same as studying it, though. If I were to eat a few litres of ice-cream that’s not a study on the effects of excessive ice-cream consumption, that’s just someone eating an unhealthy amount of ice-cream. People do stupid things all the time with the excuse that that’s how it’s always been done.

              • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Effects includea nausea, loss of motor control, and vomiting. And singing. But mainly vomiting.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’d be freaked out if I was a fish

          Honestly this is the thing I’m most worried about. I have little doubt that it’s been studied to be non-toxic. I said as much in my first comment. I’m more worried about more-difficult-to-study effects like on the behaviour of the fish.

          • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            I mean there’s too few of them left to make a good sample size anyway so fuck it let’s dye the river like it’s potato famine o clock

    • the_third@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This stuff is regularly used to mark water flows that someone wants to trace, for example when a stream disappears underground and it’s unclear where it joins the watershed again. It’s assume there’s not much to it.