For a time it was Fennic for addon support but now that Firefox mobile has addons are there better alternatives? Those of you on android, what’s your go to?

  • silent_squirrel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Mull (from the DivestOS developers)

    But nowadays I’m using a Chromium based browser on my phone because Firefox on Android doesn’t support process isolation

    • Dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      +1 for Mull.

      And yeah, on Android unfortunately you gotta choose between privacy (Firefox/Mull) or security (Chromium).

      • degen@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        Another for Mull and Cromite, here. I don’t really use Mull unless I’m looking for absolute compatibility with things like web games.

      • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Mull is reasonably secure for most of the people. Only very high targets need that kind of security

      • PirateMike94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Why not both, with Brave? I know their are kinda hated for making changes without warning the user, but it seems to be the closest thing to a fairly private and secure browser… Plus they have a whole team behind it, not just some guy in his basement (nothing against guys in their basements btw, it’s just harder to be on top of security issues when you’re one).

        • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          It would still need an Android system/kernel exploit to further escape the system sandbox. It is an important hardening feature, but the browser isn’t completely insecure without it

          So what? You can go back to firefox for that reasoning unless you are a very very high target

  • rizoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    8 months ago

    I use Firefox cause it’s easier to get people to switch to something that’s already in every app store.

  • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    IMO, standard Firefox is pretty OK, so I’d rather use that than some weird derivative that has more chances of security issues, breakage, or development halt.

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yup. So many of these “alternative” browsers have very questionable security practices. At the very minimum they don’t have a staffed team to respond to zero-day exploits. But often they also make large changes without too much consideration for security or disable security features when they get in the way of features. I hate saying “use on of the big boys” but for most users their browser is likely their largest attack surface by an order of magnitude, it’s job is literally to download an execute untrusted code and the API surface is huge. It takes real resources and careful development to develop and maintain a browser, and there are very few organizations that I would trust to do this.

      So unless you have a strong reason I would highly recommend sticking to one of the major browsers.

  • herrfrutti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    You can take a look at FFUpdater on F-Droid. There you can see different browsers for android and information about the features they have.

    I’m useing mull.

  • Delusion6903@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Mull would be perfect except for the annoyingly slow refresh rate enabled by the fingerprint resistance. It needs to just report a low refresh rate while actually using a higher one.

  • hash@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Stupid as it is my biggest complaint is that none of them seem to have amoled dark mode. Been using and enjoying fennec but I really want my perfect blacks back.

    • lorkano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      People kinda stopped implementing full black once they realized that battery savings between dark gray and black is negligible

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s still a measurable difference & it looks nicer having the pixels fully off. No need to dismiss the parent’s preference. Personally, I find the dark gray arguments pretty weak.

  • Deckweiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    iceraven

    it has a lot of the regular firefox plugins available for installation from the menu. And also some privacy enhancements.

  • auth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    Kind of offtopic but Firefox has been very unstable for me on desktop… I’m about done with it. (been using it since its initial release)