Andy@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.ml · 10 days agoThey can't hold out foreverslrpnk.netexternal-linkmessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up1303arrow-down11cross-posted to: memes@lemmy.world
arrow-up1302arrow-down1external-linkThey can't hold out foreverslrpnk.netAndy@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.ml · 10 days agomessage-square62fedilinkcross-posted to: memes@lemmy.world
minus-squareSpruceBringsteen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·10 days agoWhat impact would a nationwide guerilla campaign of vandalism against say, Berkshire do?
minus-squareOlgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·10 days agoI think we need more than vandalism. But it couldn’t hurt. Where’s Mario?
minus-squareashenone@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·edit-210 days agoWhy stop at Berkshire? Vandalize any home that sits vacant. We have more vacant homes than homeless in America. We just need to make vacant homes too big of a risk
minus-squareblindbunny@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·10 days agoNo no no open the house to people that need to crash with a roof over their head. Squatting is the answer. Maybe eve some destructive squatting.
minus-squareashenone@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·10 days agoThat’s definitely a more productive solution
minus-squarePM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·10 days ago“Productive destructive squatting” sounds like a euphemism for part of my morning routine
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·10 days agoeverything they own is insured and you would be doing them a favor if they could collect on the insurance money instead of holding onto the assets.
minus-squarefuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·10 days agoInsurance will start dropping them fast if it really catches on. A few wouldn’t affect anything. But hundreds?
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·10 days agoanytime an insurance company withdraws from an arena; they pay out to their biggest policy holders anyways and blackrock has to be the biggest.
minus-squareryathal@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 days agoProbably not. At their level it’s probably self insured, so they lose the money.
minus-squareeldavi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 days agoSomeone will lose money, but it won’t be blackrock
What impact would a nationwide guerilla campaign of vandalism against say, Berkshire do?
I think we need more than vandalism. But it couldn’t hurt. Where’s Mario?
Why stop at Berkshire? Vandalize any home that sits vacant. We have more vacant homes than homeless in America. We just need to make vacant homes too big of a risk
No no no open the house to people that need to crash with a roof over their head. Squatting is the answer. Maybe eve some destructive squatting.
That’s definitely a more productive solution
“Productive destructive squatting” sounds like a euphemism for part of my morning routine
everything they own is insured and you would be doing them a favor if they could collect on the insurance money instead of holding onto the assets.
Insurance will start dropping them fast if it really catches on. A few wouldn’t affect anything. But hundreds?
anytime an insurance company withdraws from an arena; they pay out to their biggest policy holders anyways and blackrock has to be the biggest.
Probably not. At their level it’s probably self insured, so they lose the money.
Someone will lose money, but it won’t be blackrock