• Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    ‘Sin’ is a very relative term to time (in years/decades) and religion (time & locality in prob municipalities), so maybe it wasn’t.

    (It also depends how they were doing it - on one hand they could have done much the same with a statue of her, even if she wasn’t a saint yet or in fact the opposite.)

    Maybe her wearing man clothes was a bigger “sin” as perceived at the time.

    Religion (and “sin”) is stil just people, so politics, not even religious texts, but literally intra-people politics.

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying it wasn’t shady, I’m just pointing out the possibility of it not registering on any sin level scale.

    • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s fair. And tbh, she might have been cool with it, but I’m pretty sure lying has always been viewed as bad, so lying to a monarch who is “chosen by god” seems like a big no-no, even if for some reason they managed to not mentally classify it as “bearing false witness against a neighbor”.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, I am mostly agreeing with you, I just don’t know how much of it can be translated 1:1 to that environment.

        People gave gifts to cherished figures all the time (like saints and the Church).

        It seems she lied to the king & nothing bad happened (she later even got a knight hubby with a castle). And one of the brothers got an island.