You’d think a hegemony with a 100-years tradition of upkeeping democracy against major non-democratic players, would have some mechanism that would prevent itself from throwing down it’s key ideology.

Is it really that the president is all that decides about the future of democracy itself? Is 53 out of 100 senate seats really enough to make country fall into authoritarian regime? Is the army really not constitutionally obliged to step in and save the day?

I’d never think that, of all places, American democracy would be the most volatile.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      6 days ago

      And knowing that he’s a convicted felon. And twice impeached. And almost certainly a rapist. And a successful conman.

    • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Democracy is when the people can remove anyone in office from office. American democracy is saying bribes are lobbying.

        • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          If people want tyranny people must get tryranny. Issue is if people no longer want tyranny they must be able to get rid of it as well. Or maybe don allow tyranny in the first place since people have proven over and over again to be too stupid to be allowed full control.