Well, I guess that’s one way to solve the problem 🙄

  • Damionsipher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    This policy is at the state level and states do not have jurisdiction over vehicle standards. Vehicle standards are regulated by the national government, so this is more of an addressing the symptom of an issue the state has no control over the cause of. That doesn’t mean it’s not ridiculous that garage size regulations are what’s changing, but let’s cast share where it’s due.

    • br3d@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t know the Australian constitution, but I’m guessing there’s nothing in there that obliges states to accommodate stupid decisions by national government?

      • Damionsipher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t know the Australian constitution or legal structure either, but as vehicle regulations are set by the feds thes states still need to deal with the repercussions. They could do nothing instead, but they have no power to reduce vehicle sizes. A better approach might be to get rid of parking requirements altogether. But, that’s more likely to be political suicide for the elected officials than to spur on a broader anti-car sentiment, especially given the rural nature of the state.

        • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          They could do nothing instead, but they have no power to reduce vehicle sizes.

          Whike this is true they could loudly advocate the national government to change the laws and ban shitty US sized utes. They could also shout loudly about making those small Japanese trucks easy and tax free…

          This also doesn’t address the problem, where it is an issue aren’t going to rebuild, not for decades anyway.