He generally shows most of the signs of the misinformation accounts:

  • Wants to repeatedly tell basically the same narrative and nothing else
  • Narrative is fundamentally false
  • Not interested in any kind of conversation or in learning that what he’s posting is backwards from the values he claims to profess

I also suspect that it’s not a coincidence that this is happening just as the Elon Musks of the world are ramping up attacks on Wikipedia, specially because it is a force for truth in the world that’s less corruptible than a lot of the others, and tends to fight back legally if someone tries to interfere with the free speech or safety of its editors.

Anyway, YSK. I reported him as misinformation, but who knows if that will lead to any result.

Edit: Number of people real salty that I’m talking about this: Lots

  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    it’s possible he’s wrong and you’re still toxic. by pigeon holing him with musk you are creating a perception that has no basis in anything they’ve said.

    you need to stop “researching” fediverse users.

    just fucking stop.

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      What I’m accusing him is not at all just being “wrong.” Anyone can be wrong, myself included. The accusation I’m making is that he simply doesn’t care about the truth, and is willing to say even diametrically opposed factual statements as long as they both sound bad for Wikipedia. I think we should keep that off the network, or at least talk about it when it happens. That’s not toxic. That is being interested in the truth.

      What do you mean when you say “researching”? What do you mean when you say I’m pigeon holing him with Musk? I never said anything about Elon Musk at all, that I remember.