• TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    I did read the article and drew the conclusion I just stated. Feel free to offer your own take.

    • faltryka@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      While he certainly wasn’t sensitive about how he said it, he did state is was sanctions related.

      • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        He was not clear on that at all. For all we know it could be an excuse among the several vague ones he gave or a reference to pressure from Feds.

        • faltryka@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          And FYI for the actual innocent bystanders who aren’t troll farm accounts - the “various compliance requirements” are not just a US thing.

          If you haven’t heard of Russian sanctions yet, you should try to read the news some day. And by “news”, I don’t mean Russian state-sponsored spam.

          • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            The “various comoliance requirements” are unstated. Everything here is being left to a vague implication.