Shitendo strikes again

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    In case anyone was wondering, Pocketpair has already announced they’re going to fight Nintendo.

    Unlike a certain other company that folded like a coward in 2 days after a simple C&D letter, took their money and ran.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Lol this is hilarious. “Coward”. Have you ever looked down the barrel of an enterprise legal team, and seen just the opening bill to defend team? I haven’t, but I’m aware that it is a huge and expensive endeavor and “bravery” has nothing to do with it.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        You mean what Pocketpair is doing right now? They’re both businesses who should have known they would come up against Nintendo at some point.

        • sinceasdf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Pocket pair has money. Pal world was a smash hit and sold millions of copies and they could still be buried under legal fees by a behemoth like Nintendo via bullshit like repeated appeals

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          The claims are very different. I’m not moving the goalposts here, it’s critical to the situation and was always available information.

    • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not cowardice to refuse to fight a completely unwinnable battle. You only fight if you can win something. Otherwise, take the inevitable loss and spend the resources elsewhere.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        It wasn’t completely unwinnable, it was legally untested waters and could have gone either way, had they fought and won they would have even set a precedent for future emulation projects.

        This wasn’t some 2 person team project. It was a company with real money that could have fought and laid the foundation for the future safety of emulation. And because they were a company all liability laid with the company with no personal liability risk to the founders. But they didn’t, they settled in less than 2 days, tucked tail and ran with the remaining money.

        Cowards.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yuzu, and before any of their apologists come on here, they were a company that reportedly had millions in the bank and could have fought.

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yuzu were scuzzy as fuck. There’s a thread in /r/emulation where one of their members admits to the project stealing code from Ryujinx and then whines like a little baby over getting called out on it, claiming that it’s okay to steal open-source code without attribution.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          What’s millions to Nintendo? Yuzu’s a business at it’s core. they are designed to make money

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Right and their current assessment (from their legal team) clearly is that they have a case to defend themselves.

              Yuzu, based on their actions, determined they didn’t.

              Edit as such, spending the money would have been just burning it.

              It’s not bravery

              • cm0002@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                It was less than 2 days that Yuzu made their announcement. They didn’t carefully consider shit, they had their exit plan in case Nintendo came knocking and it was to run for the hills like cowards wasting the opportunity to set a real precedent and possibly protecting the future of other emulation projects.

                And they were a company, all liability rested with the company, not the people running it, so they could have easily run it into the ground fighting and then went “whoopsy” and declared bankruptcy like so many companies have done

                They were cowards.

                • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Right. If the company keeps their money, they have money, for money things. Like giving the staff money, to make others products for money.

                  If they stack all their money, shove it up a lawyer’s ass, and send them waddling in the Nintendo front door, they apparently have bravery, but, alas, no money.

                  It would be poor leadership to “go into the ground”.

                • Dadd Volante@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Blatantly incorrect. They jumped on the sword to protect a legal precedent concerning emulation.

                  If the courts had ruled in favor of Nintendo, guess what? That means ALL emulators are on the chopping block. All of them. They knew.

                  Once you have case history to back you up, it becomes a domino effect.

                  This has absolutely nothing to do with cowardice.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    nintendo and friends are out of line. Undisclosed patents being infringed sounds bullshit, and game patents are even more bullshit. tony hawk isn’t the only skating game. cod isn’t the only shooting game. Pokémon and palworld certainly aren’t the only creature capture and exploit for human benefit games.

  • Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Either strike right after release or don’t strike at all. Palworld was already starting to lose steam. Nintendo is doing a Streisand effect.

  • TimeNaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fuck Nintendo but they do have a point here. You can only get so far with artistic inspiration until it becomes straight up plagiarism.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They are suing over a patent though (ie, a technology). What you are talking about is a copyright suit.

      Unfortunately we don’t know what patents Nintendo is suing over. And I struggle to think of a patent that would generate a good faith claim.

      • HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, from I’ve read they haven’t quoted any specific patent to anyone. They don’t have good grounds, they just want it shut down.

      • Clasm@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Looks like it’s over the game mechanics of ‘releasing a creature into a 3d environment and having it perform a contextual task’ & ‘having a rideable mount switch to a different rideable mount depending on terrain’

        I don’t think either of these would work in the US, because you can’t protect game mechanics here, but I’m not sure about Japan’s take.

        Edit: I missed that this was still under speculation at the time of the post:

        https://bulbagarden.net/threads/nintendo-and-the-pokemon-company-jointly-file-lawsuit-for-patent-infringement-against-palworld-creator-pocketpair-inc-in-the-tokyo-district-court.303354/

        Based on searching of Japanese patent databases, initial speculation is that these may include (but is not necessarily limited to) patents relating to game mechanics and gameplay features from Pokémon: Legends Arceus, and may include patents such as one for throwing and using Poké Balls in a 3D space (JP,2023-092953,A); and one for automatically switching between ride Pokémon as a player transitions between different terrain, such as between air and the ground (JP,2023-092954,A).

        • atocci@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          They haven’t actually said what the alleged infringement is yet, so we can’t know for sure what excuse they’re going to come up with. They haven’t even told Pocketpair!

        • tiramichu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Kinda wild that you could patent a super basic mechanic that pretty much anyone could come up with

          • Clasm@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Pocketpair has a pretty good case against Nintendo here, I think, because other games have used these things before.

            I know it was never actually released, but Scalebound had a mechanic that would have allowed a player to tell their dragon to perform a task, albeit, usually destructively.

            Guild Wars 2 Added a mechanic years ago that let players traverse water and land by automatically a switching between mounts.

            ‘Releasing’ a creature into a 3d environment has been done by every minion-mancer class in an MMO since the dawn of the genre.

    • atocci@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Presumably, since Nintendo isn’t claiming copyright infringement, Palworld hasn’t crossed the line of plagiarism. They are all legally distinct designs.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t agree with that at all - that’s how art works. You take ideas and techniques and copy them, adding your own twist in the process. Art is about more than the aesthetic - the backstory is what gives it value. Stealing that is plagiarism, everything else is artistic inspiration… If you add nothing new you’ve made a cheap knockoff, which is very different from plagiarism

      Palworld has its own lore, its own type system, its own battle mechanics, and as far as gameplay it’s nothing like Pokemon. All it has in common is many creatures you capture in a ball, with designs largely based on IRL animals and Japanese folklore. They’ve made something new no matter how you slice it