Comparison left vs right for a craftsman who doesnt know which one he should buy:

  • l/r same bed size

  • r lower bed for way easier loading/unloading

  • r less likely to crash

  • r less fuel consumption and costs

  • r less expensive to repair

  • r easy to park

  • r easy to get around in narrow places like crowded construction sites or towns

  • r not participating in road arms race

  • l You get taken serious by your fellow carbrained americans because ““trucks”” are normalized and small handy cars are ridiculed.

So unless you are a fragile piece of human, choose the right one.

  • TheTaj@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    I agree with the sentiment of this post, but to be fair, you can also carry 3 or 4 passengers in the left vehicle, as opposed to only one in the right.

    The main problem is the US fuel economy regulations actually encourage manufacturers to build bigger trucks and SUVs so they get classified into a category that has looser fuel economy requirements.

    • fluxion@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      The extended cab version of the right truck would still tick all the boxes.

      Off-road and towing capacity are probably the main feature you give up with that sort of design. Whether or not most people need that is a separate story.

      • oatscoop@midwest.socialEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        They make kei trucks in 4x4, but you do lose ground clearance.

        That being said, what kind of “off road” conditions are any of the trucks really contending with?

    • YashaB@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      You are right. Still the american truck is hugely oversized, even for 5 persons and cargo. But, for the sake of the argument, imagine standing on the highway. Have a gander at the cars around you. How many people per car do you see? Exactly, 90% of the time there is exactly one person in a car. What makes the american truck an extreme waste of space an ressources, beside being a health hazard to everyone outside of the car.

      Cars should get smaller, not bigger.

  • Robcia1220@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    I get the point your trying to prove but i don’t think it’s fair to compare these 2 as they are meant for different things and also brings in the assumption that all American craftsman vehicles are 2500HD’s, which is not true.

    Now I agree, people using the one on the left specifically as a daily driver is actually overkill and are not using it for what it’s supposed to be used for. The one on the left is a 2500HD. They are SUPPOSED to be used for hauling and carrying equipment. The crew cab is meant to also transport the crew that is for said equipment.

    The one the right is specifically meant what appears to be lighter duty use and hauling. I agree that people should use the right tool for the job. I find the one on the right to be very practical. But for the sake of this post as a means to compare Japanese craftsman vehicles to American.

    You should actually show something actually comparable. Like a ford ranger with a standard cab. Which might be about the same size and power. Maybe even the same bed size. Not something that has HD (Heavy duty) in its name.

  • MiddleWeigh@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    Yep. I’m an American tradesman and the trucks that the guys drive are way too beefy for what they actually do.

    I’ve gotten by with small Toyota trucks, and rav 4s…much to the chagrin of the good old boys. Should have seen their face when I rolled up in a prius…till I tell em I get 50 mpg easy.

    I would love a small little truck like this one in the photo.